Search Results
2481 results found for
Insight
Entitlements of Employees who Resign with an Extended Notice Period
In the absence of a contractual provision to the contrary, an employee must provide his or her employer with reasonable notice of his or her resignation. Occasionally, however, an employer may find itself faced with the question of how to handle an employee who has resigned and provided the employer with an excessively lengthy notice […]
Read more about Entitlements of Employees who Resign with an Extended Notice Period
Insight
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal rules that multiple proceedings are permitted in many circumstances
Overview Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal has held that while multiple or duplicative proceedings are generally undesirable, they are not prohibited. In the decision of Herold v Wassermann,[1] the Court set out the factors to be considered in determining whether an individual action should be permitted to proceed at the same time as a class action. […]
Read more about Saskatchewan Court of Appeal rules that multiple proceedings are permitted in many circumstances
Insight
Applying the reasonableness standard to Indigenous consultation requirements
Assessing the implications of Coldwater v. Trans Mountain on major resource project approvals in Canada On February 4, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in Coldwater v. Trans Mountain, 2020 FCA 34 (“Coldwater”), considering legal challenges to the federal Cabinet’s second approval of the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (the “Project”). The Court […]
Read more about Applying the reasonableness standard to Indigenous consultation requirements
Insight
A new era: Free prior and informed consent
Canada’s unqualified adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (“UNDRIP”) in 2016 rang alarm bells for many prospectors and developers across Canada. It elevated the debate as to whether consent of Indigenous peoples would be required before conducting any mineral exploration or development activities and more importantly, whether permits were […]
Read more about A new era: Free prior and informed consent
Insight
Frivolous, vexatious, or abusive applications or proceedings: The Court of King’s Bench clarifies (and limits) the use of Civil Practice Note 7
Introduction On April 12, 2023, Associate Chief Justice Nielsen provided much needed clarity on the purpose of Alberta’s Civil Practice Note 7 (“CPN7”) entititled “Vexatious Application/Proceeding Show Cause Procedure (General Powers to Stay or Dismiss a Frivolous, Vexatious, or Abusive Application or Proceeding).” [1] In De’Medici v Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2023 ABKB [De’Medici], Justice […]
Read more about Frivolous, vexatious, or abusive applications or proceedings: The Court of King’s Bench clarifies (and limits) the use of Civil Practice Note 7
Team Member
Darin J. Hannaford
Darin J. Hannaford brings decades of litigation experience to the table, catering to diverse industries in Western Canada in contractual, construction, transportation, environmental, and regulatory matters. He represents contractors in large construction claims and disputes, and advises multinational corporate clients on commercial and environmental litigation, shareholder disputes, employment issues, advertising, regulatory approvals, municipal law, and […]
Read more about Darin J. Hannaford
Insight
Toronto and Ottawa vacant homes tax: Don’t forget to file your declaration for 2022!
In 2022, Toronto and Ottawa introduced vacant homes tax regimes.[1] These regimes are modelled after the empty homes tax regime introduced in Vancouver in 2017, and are aimed at incentivizing owners of vacant residential properties to sell or rent their properties. Unlike the federal Underused Housing Tax Act, these municipal regimes are not limited to […]
Read more about Toronto and Ottawa vacant homes tax: Don’t forget to file your declaration for 2022!
Insight
Supreme Court says corporations not protected against cruel and unusual punishment
Overview The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that corporations are not protected from cruel or unusual punishment by section 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [Charter] in the recent decision of Québec (Attorney General) v 9147-0732 Québec inc.[1] The Court split[2] over the proper approach to constitutional interpretation, and the majority decision […]
Read more about Supreme Court says corporations not protected against cruel and unusual punishment
Insight
Liability for defamatory statements reposted on social media
Introduction Social media offers a platform for the sharing of information; however, the use of social media presents unique and significant legal challenges and potential liability, including the issues of jurisdiction and defamation. In Durand v Higgins, 2024 ABKB 108 (“Durand”), the Alberta Court of King’s Bench found an individual liable for defamation for reposting […]
Read more about Liability for defamatory statements reposted on social media
Insight
Meaningful consent and data protection of third-party apps: Federal Court dismisses Privacy Commissioner’s complaint against Facebook
On April 13, 2023, the Federal Court handed down its decision in a case brought by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (the “OPC”) against Facebook Inc. (“Facebook”).[1] The case centers around Facebook’s obligations with respect to third-party applications’ data protections. It also provides helpful insight on the interpretation of “consent” under Canadian […]
Read more about Meaningful consent and data protection of third-party apps: Federal Court dismisses Privacy Commissioner’s complaint against Facebook