Impact of Budget 2011

March 22, 2011 | Robert B. Hayhoe

The 2011 Federal Budget (the “Budget”) contains a number of anti-avoidance measures described below.  It does not contain any measures designed to assist with charitable giving or to lessen the regulatory load on Canadian charities.  Rather the changes proposed are consistent with the promotion of transparency and accountability, as well as the Government’s long-standing fight against what it views as abusive tax shelters.

What is interesting at this point is that the Budget may not pass.  As of publication time, all opposition parties have indicated their intention to vote against the Budget.  If this occurs, these budget proposals will be defeated.  It is customary for the Department of Finance to propose technical changes to the Income Tax Act, that are not passed for many years, but CRA still treats them as being in effect from date of announcement (on the basis of a retroactive effective date in the eventual legislation).  While a subsequent government (of any party) can be expected to bring back some of the charity Budget proposals, it will be very interesting to see whether changes from a defeated 2011 Budget that are sought to be brought back in a second 2011 Budget are given an effective date of the first or the second 2011 Budget.

Charities and donors caught by the Budget changes should seek specific legal advice on whether the changes are likely to have effect on March 22, 2011 or perhaps at a later date.


This publication is provided as an information service and may include items reported from other sources. We do not warrant its accuracy. This information is not meant as legal opinion or advice.

Miller Thomson LLP uses your contact information to send you information electronically on legal topics, seminars, and firm events that may be of interest to you. If you have any questions about our information practices or obligations under Canada's anti-spam laws, please contact us at

© 2022 Miller Thomson LLP. This publication may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety provided no alterations are made to the form or content. Any other form of reproduction or distribution requires the prior written consent of Miller Thomson LLP which may be requested by contacting