Charitable Sector Measures

March 22, 2011

Changes Affecting Charities and Non-Profits

The 2011 Budget proposes numerous changes that will affect charities, qualified donees and other non-profits, and donors.  A summary of these changes is below.  For a more detailed review of these changes, see the Budget Edition of the Miller Thomson Charities & Not-for-Profit Newsletter.

Flow-Through Shares

The Budget proposes to limit the availability of the exemption from tax on capital gains where flow-through shares are donated to a qualified donee.  Prior to this change it was possible to combine the charitable donation tax credit or deduction with the flow-through share tax incentives to reduce the cost of charitable giving dramatically.

Effective immediately, the exemption from tax on the capital gain that arises from the donation of the shares will only apply to the extent that the cumulative capital gains in respect to the gift or disposition of the shares exceed the original cost of the flow-through shares.  This will have the effect in most provinces of causing a donation of flow-through shares to be no more attractive than a gift of cash.

Regulatory Changes Affecting Qualified Donees

The Budget has proposed significant changes to the regulatory regime that applies to qualified donees other than registered charities.  The Income Tax Act provides that official donation receipts can be issued not only by registered charities, but also by other organizations that meet the definition of “qualified donee,” including registered Canadian amateur athletic associations (RCAAAs), Canadian municipalities, and prescribed foreign universities.  Historically, these organizations have been subject to less stringent regulatory rules than registered charities.  The Budget proposes to close this gap significantly and extend most of the regulatory rules and associated penalties that currently apply only to registered charities to RCAAAs.  In addition, most qualified donees would be made subject to the rules governing record-keeping and the issuing of donation receipts (as well as to penalties for non-compliance, including revocation of qualified donee status).  The Budget also proposes to require that all qualified donees be included on a publicly-available list maintained by CRA.

The Budget proposes several additional changes that will apply specifically to RCAAAs.  It proposes to change the test which must be met by an RCAAA in order to qualify for qualified donee status.  RCAAAs are currently required to be established with the promotion of amateur athletics in Canada on a nation-wide basis as their primary purpose and function.  The Budget proposes that RCAAAs be required to have the promotion of amateur athletics in Canada on a nation-wide basis as their exclusive purpose and function.

CRA Governance Control

The Budget also proposes, effective 2012, that the CRA be given discretionary power to refuse or revoke registration of a charity where one of its directors has been convicted of a financial or other relevant crime, has been convicted in the past 5 years of a regulatory offence (including a violation of fundraising licensing rules), was a director of another  charity whose charitable status was revoked for cause in the past five years, or was a promoter of a donation tax shelter for which a charity had its registration revoked.  We expect, notwithstanding Federal Government’s suggestion to the contrary in the Budget materials, that this will cause charities to begin background checks against directors and senior staff.

Returning Gifts

The Budget proposes rules to address the situation where a qualified donee, such as a charity, returns a gift.  We note that it is rare for a charity to be able to return a gift legally. However, if this occurs, the new rules deem the gift not to have occurred.  If the returned property is not identical property, then the person is deemed to have disposed of the original property at the time the person acquires the returned property.   For returned amounts above $50, charities will be required to issue replacement receipts and file them with CRA.   CRA will have the authority to reassess a tax return even where the return is for a statute-barred year.

Non-Qualifying Security Anti-Avoidance Rules

The Budget proposes anti-avoidance provisions to broaden the rules on donations of non-qualifying securities. These rules prevent a person from receiving a donation tax receipt for a gift to a qualified donee of a share, debt obligation or other security of the person or of a person not at arm’s-length to the person — known as a non-qualifying security (a “NQS”) — until the NQS is sold or is no longer a NQS.  The Budget proposes that where a charity sells the NQS, the donor will not receive a receipt if the consideration for the sale is another NQS of any person.  Second, the Budget proposed new rules to catch situations whereby, through a series of transactions, a donor avoids the application of these rules, but at the end of the series of transactions the qualifying donee obtains a NQS.

Gifts of Options

The Budget has introduced provisions designed to delay the recognition of a gift where an option to acquire a property is granted to a qualified donee.  Prior to the introduction of these provisions, where a donor granted an option in a property to a qualified donee, the gift was recognized immediately for the value of the option and a receipt could be issued.

Now, when a donor issues an option to a qualified donee, the recognition of the resulting gift is delayed until the option is exercised by the qualified donee.

These rules are designed to be in keeping with the (still-proposed) split-receipting 80/20 tax rule that provides that where an advantage associated with a gift exceeds 80 per cent of the value of the property transferred, there is no gift.  As such, where 80 per cent of the fair market value of the underlying property exceeds the total of any consideration paid for either the option or the property by the qualified donee, the exercise of the option will not be considered to be a gift unless the donor can establish that the granting of the option and the exercise thereof was made with the intention of making a gift to a qualified donee.  The proposed provisions also deal with the value of the gift for receipting purposes when the option is exercised, and when the option is disposed of by the qualified donee prior to being exercised, the proceeds of disposition to the donor and the value of the gift for receipting purposes.

Disclaimer

This publication is provided as an information service and may include items reported from other sources. We do not warrant its accuracy. This information is not meant as legal opinion or advice.

Miller Thomson LLP uses your contact information to send you information electronically on legal topics, seminars, and firm events that may be of interest to you. If you have any questions about our information practices or obligations under Canada's anti-spam laws, please contact us at privacy@millerthomson.com.

© 2020 Miller Thomson LLP. This publication may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety provided no alterations are made to the form or content. Any other form of reproduction or distribution requires the prior written consent of Miller Thomson LLP which may be requested by contacting newsletters@millerthomson.com.