Mark Puszczak

Sociétaire | Edmonton

780.429.9492

Portrait de Mark Puszczak
Affichage de 1 à 9 sur 9
( Disponible en anglais seulement )

When can an electronic message extend a limitation period in Alberta?

Background / Overview Limitation periods are a tenet of modern legal systems. At a high level, these imposed requirements provide a specific period of time within which action must be taken with respect to commencing a legal claim, failing which […]

Plus

Recueil de droit de la construction

Dans le cadre de sa conférence annuelle du 5 octobre 2023, le groupe en droit de la construction de Miller Thomson a rédigé un recueil de textes éclairants portant sur les sujets abordés lors de l’événement. Télécharger le PDF (6.6 […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Enforceability of non-competition clauses and damages for mental distress in commercial agreements: Ruel v Rebonne, 2023 ABCA 156

Introduction and overview In Ruel v Rebonne, 2023 ABCA 156,[1] the Alberta Court of Appeal (“ABCA”), upheld a 5-year non-competition clause in a purchase and sale agreement as being reasonable. In doing so, the Court confirmed the proper approach for […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

CCS Contracting Ltd. v. Condominium Corporation No. 1520090 and certificates of Lis Pendens under the Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act

Introduction The Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act (the “PPCLA”),[1] and it’s predecessor the Builders’ Lien Act, have a few overarching themes, one of which is efficient and streamlined dispute resolution both to ensure funds are promptly paid, and to […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Alberta’s new prompt payment and construction lien legislation: An overview

On August 29, 2022, the Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act, RSA 2000, c P-26.4 (the “Act”), came into force in Alberta. The construction lawyers at Miller Thomson LLP have been preparing for the Act’s implementation for over a year […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

It’s only money: Pure economic loss and the decision of Rieger v. Plains Midstream Canada ULC, 2022 ABCA 28

On January 31, 2022, the Alberta Court of Appeal (ABCA) issued its decision in Rieger v. Plains Midstream Canada ULC.[1] The ABCA adopted the analysis as set out in the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) decision, 1688782 Ontario Inc. v. […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

What to expect as the implementation of prompt payment in Alberta looms: The final countdown

The Alberta Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act (the “Act”) is set to be implemented on August 29, 2022. As this date approaches, we have some final notes on what businesses can expect as the Act comes into force. Our […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

What damages can you lien for? PME Inc v Enerkem Alberta Biofuels LP (Enerkem Alberta Biofuels GP Inc), 2021 ABQB 889

The decision of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in PME Inc v Enerkem Alberta Biofuels LP (Enerkem Alberta Biofuels GP Inc)[1] considers whether the lien fund or the value of a builders’ lien under the Alberta Builders’ Lien Act, […]

Plus

The interpretation of releases and the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Corner Brook (City) v Bailey

In its recent decision in Corner Brook (City) v Bailey,[i] the Supreme Court of Canada discussed the interpretation of releases and, more importantly, the proper approach for determining the scope of each specific release. Although decided in the context of […]

Plus

Affichage de 1 à 9 sur 9