Blogues

Les blogues de Miller Thomson abordent des points de droit canadien sous un angle plus informel. Découvrez les diverses perspectives de nos avocats.

Filtrer

Affichage de 191-199 of 199

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Cross-Border Consequences of Secondment

23 novembre 2012

Blogue : Exploiter une entreprise au Canada pour les non-résidents

Cross-Border Consequences of Secondment This posting was authored by Cheryl Teron and Stephen Rukavina Miller Thomson LLP. Secondment often involves one company (the “Lending Employer”) lending its employees to another related company in another country (the “Receiving Employer”) for the […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Scents and Sensitivities

18 septembre 2012 | Thomas V. Duke

Blogue du secteur du droit du travail et de l'emploi au Canada

Employers often face a variety of complaints from employees about health concerns due to individual conditions. One Ontario employer recently faced a Human Rights complaint for its failure to eliminate all scents from the workplace in the case of Kovios […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Corporate Tax Rates for Non-Residents Carrying on Business in Canada

7 août 2012

Blogue : Exploiter une entreprise au Canada pour les non-résidents

Foreign companies that want to carry on business in Canada generally do so through a Canadian branch or a Canadian subsidiary. This post outlines the general tax rates for non-residents carrying on business in Canada using one of those structures. […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Gender Identity and Access to Women’s Washroom Facilities

9 juillet 2012

Blogue du secteur du droit du travail et de l'emploi au Canada

Author: Erik Marshall In response to a communiqué we recently published, in which we reported that a proposed amendment to the Ontario Human Rights Code (“Ontario Code”) that would see “gender identity” and “gender expression” added to the list of […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

What does « Authorized by Law » to Drive Mean?

23 mai 2012

Blogue : Droit des assurances

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released a decision interpreting the meaning of the phrase “authorized by law” in s. 4(1) of O. Reg. 777/93 (Statutory Condition 4 in the OAP). In Kereluik v. Jevco, the insured Kereluik was […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Entitlements of Employees who Resign with an Extended Notice Period

3 avril 2012 | Jill W. Wilkie

Blogue du secteur du droit du travail et de l'emploi au Canada

In the absence of a contractual provision to the contrary, an employee must provide his or her employer with reasonable notice of his or her resignation. Occasionally, however, an employer may find itself faced with the question of how to […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Insurer Must Defend G2 Licensed Drunk Driver

29 juin 2011

Blogue : Droit des assurances

Today’s Ontario Reports contained an interesting duty to defend decision from February 2011. In Tut v. RBC Insurance, the applicant sought a declaration that the respondent RBC Insurance owed them a duty to defend the allegations of negligence made against […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Public Transit Motor Vehicle Accidents about to Become Non-Accidents

2 mai 2011

Blogue : Droit des assurances

UPDATE — Bill 173 received Royal Assent on May 12, 2011. Accordingly, these important changes to the Insurance Act are now in effect. On March 29, 2011, the Ontario Legislature unveiled its pre-election budget, in Bill 173, otherwise known as the […]

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Court Finds Coverage under OPCF 44R

21 avril 2011

Blogue : Droit des assurances

This week’s Ontario Reports contained an interesting coverage decision involving Ontario’s Family Protection Endorsement and claims against the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund. In Graham v. Superintendent of Financial Services Commission of Ontario (2010 ONSC 7129), Christine Graham was riding her bicycle […]

Plus

Affichage de 191-199 of 199

Avis de non-responsabilité

Les renseignements affichés sur ce blogue contiennent des points de droit variés fournis uniquement à des fins informatives et non commerciales. Ces renseignements ne constituent pas un avis juridique de la part de l’auteur. Nous mettons en garde les lecteurs de ne pas prendre de décision particulière sans avoir préalablement obtenu l’avis juridique d’un professionnel qualifié. Toute personne qui décide de prendre une décision en s’appuyant sur ces renseignements le fait à ses propres risques.