{"id":11354,"date":"2021-01-04T07:00:33","date_gmt":"2023-08-12T08:04:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/"},"modified":"2023-08-12T04:04:04","modified_gmt":"2023-08-12T08:04:04","slug":"recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/","title":{"rendered":"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Journal Constructo \u2013 10 d\u00e9cembre 2020<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Les appels d\u2019offres publics contiennent g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement une clause dite \u00ab\u00a0de r\u00e9serve\u00a0\u00bb par laquelle le donneur d\u2019ouvrage se m\u00e9nage la possibilit\u00e9 de ne retenir aucune soumission ou de ne pas retenir la plus basse soumission re\u00e7ue. Bien que les tribunaux aient reconnu le droit du donneur d\u2019ouvrage de recourir \u00e0 une telle clause, cela ne lui conf\u00e8re pas une discr\u00e9tion absolue \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard.<\/p>\n<p>Tout r\u00e9cemment, la Cour sup\u00e9rieure a \u00e9t\u00e9 appel\u00e9e \u00e0 d\u00e9terminer si la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 qu\u00e9b\u00e9coise des infrastructures (\u00ab<strong>\u00a0SQI<\/strong>\u00a0\u00bb) avait commis une faute en ayant recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve au terme d\u2019un appel d\u2019offres dans l\u2019affaire <em>ITR Acoustique Qu\u00e9bec inc. <\/em>c.<em> Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 qu\u00e9b\u00e9coise des infrastructures<\/em> <a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Les faits<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dans le cadre de la Phase A de la construction du Centre int\u00e9gr\u00e9 de canc\u00e9rologie (\u00ab\u00a0<strong>CIC<\/strong>\u00a0\u00bb) du nouveau centre hospitalier de Qu\u00e9bec, la SQI lance un appel d\u2019offres pour les travaux de la sp\u00e9cialit\u00e9 \u00ab Syst\u00e8me int\u00e9rieur \u00bb le 17 juillet 2018. \u00c0 l\u2019ouverture des soumissions, ITR Acoustique Qu\u00e9bec inc. (\u00ab\u00a0<strong>ITR<\/strong>\u00a0\u00bb) est la plus basse soumissionnaire conforme.<\/p>\n<p>Le 10\u00a0octobre 2018, ITR apprend que la SQI se pr\u00e9vaut de la clause de r\u00e9serve et annule l\u2019appel d\u2019offres. Quelques semaines plus tard, un nouvel appel d\u2019offres est publi\u00e9 pour les travaux de la m\u00eame sp\u00e9cialit\u00e9, cette fois-ci pour les phases A et B du CIC. Au terme de ce nouvel appel d\u2019offres, le contrat est octroy\u00e9 \u00e0 un autre entrepreneur.<\/p>\n<p>Dans les jours qui suivent la fermeture du nouvel appel d\u2019offres, ITR intente un recours en dommages contre la SQI au motif que cette derni\u00e8re a ill\u00e9galement eu recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve et que le contrat aurait d\u00fb lui \u00eatre octroy\u00e9. En d\u00e9fense, la SQI invoque que le recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve \u00e9tait justifi\u00e9 \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 que la soumission d\u2019ITR d\u00e9passait de 54\u00a0% son estimation interne du co\u00fbt des travaux.<\/p>\n<p><strong>La d\u00e9cision<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Pour d\u00e9terminer si la SQI \u00e9tait en droit de recourir \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve afin d\u2019annuler l\u2019appel d\u2019offres du 17\u00a0juillet 2018, le tribunal rappelle les principes qui doivent guider l\u2019analyse du caract\u00e8re raisonnable de la d\u00e9cision\u00a0: 1) l\u2019examen du comportement de la SQI doit s\u2019effectuer au moment o\u00f9 celle-ci prend sa d\u00e9cision, 2) la bonne foi de la SQI doit \u00eatre pr\u00e9sum\u00e9e et 3) en pr\u00e9sence de motifs valables, la SQI peut recourir \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve.<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s avoir analys\u00e9 attentivement le comportement de la SQI, le tribunal conclut que la d\u00e9cision a \u00e9t\u00e9 prise de bonne foi \u00e0 la suite d&rsquo;une analyse ad\u00e9quate de la soumission, des sc\u00e9narios possibles, de l\u2019\u00e9valuation dont elle disposait et de son appr\u00e9ciation du march\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Entre autres, le directeur ex\u00e9cutif de projets de la SQI a d\u00e9montr\u00e9 un grand souci de respecter les budgets qui lui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9s pour la construction du CIC. Conscient du caract\u00e8re inhabituel de l\u2019annulation d\u2019un appel d\u2019offres, celui-ci avait \u00e9valu\u00e9 les diff\u00e9rents sc\u00e9narios offerts avant de prendre sa d\u00e9cision.<\/p>\n<p>La soumission d\u2019ITR pr\u00e9sentait un \u00e9cart consid\u00e9rable avec l\u2019estimation effectu\u00e9e par la SQI et celle de son g\u00e9rant-constructeur. Dans de telles circonstances, le tribunal ne pouvait remettre en cause un tel motif. Par ailleurs, le juge retient que seules deux soumissionnaires ont r\u00e9pondu \u00e0 l\u2019appel d\u2019offres en raison d\u2019une surchauffe du march\u00e9 des appels d\u2019offres \u00e0 la fin de l\u2019\u00e9t\u00e9\u00a02018.<\/p>\n<p>Selon le tribunal, le comportement de la SQI ne permettait donc pas de conclure qu\u2019elle n\u2019avait pas trait\u00e9 ITR de fa\u00e7on \u00e9quitable et, par cons\u00e9quent, le tribunal a rejet\u00e9 la r\u00e9clamation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Cette d\u00e9cision est int\u00e9ressante puisqu\u2019elle rappelle les principes devant guider l\u2019analyse du caract\u00e8re raisonnable de la d\u00e9cision du donneur d\u2019ouvrage de se pr\u00e9valoir d\u2019une clause de r\u00e9serve. \u00c0 cet effet, au moment de prendre sa d\u00e9cision, le donneur d\u2019ouvrage doit agir de bonne foi et s\u2019appuyer sur des motifs raisonnables. Par exemple, il pourrait \u00eatre difficile pour un soumissionnaire se croyant l\u00e9s\u00e9 \u00e0 la suite de l\u2019annulation d\u2019un appel d\u2019offres de contester la d\u00e9cision si le motif justifiant l\u2019annulation est un d\u00e9passement du budget. Un tel motif ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 reconnu comme \u00e9tant suffisant par les tribunaux. \u00c0 l\u2019inverse, en l\u2019absence de motif valable, le donneur d\u2019ouvrage s\u2019expose au risque de devoir indemniser le soumissionnaire.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> <em>ITR<\/em><em>\u00a0Acoustique\u00a0Qu\u00e9bec inc. <\/em>c.<em> Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 qu\u00e9b\u00e9coise des infrastructures<\/em>, 2020 QCCS 3492 (CanLII)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cet article est paru dans l\u2019\u00e9dition du 10 d\u00e9cembre 2020 du journal Constructo.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Journal Constructo \u2013 10 d\u00e9cembre 2020 Les appels d\u2019offres publics contiennent g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement une clause dite \u00ab\u00a0de r\u00e9serve\u00a0\u00bb par laquelle le donneur d\u2019ouvrage se m\u00e9nage la possibilit\u00e9 de ne retenir aucune soumission ou de ne pas retenir la plus basse soumission re\u00e7ue. Bien que les tribunaux aient reconnu le droit du donneur d\u2019ouvrage de recourir \u00e0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":100,"featured_media":14341,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[592],"insight-format":[470],"class_list":["post-11354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Journal Constructo \u2013 10 d\u00e9cembre 2020 Les appels d\u2019offres publics contiennent g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement une clause dite \u00ab\u00a0de r\u00e9serve\u00a0\u00bb par laquelle le donneur d\u2019ouvrage se m\u00e9nage la possibilit\u00e9 de ne retenir aucune soumission ou de ne pas retenir la plus basse soumission re\u00e7ue. Bien que les tribunaux aient reconnu le droit du donneur d\u2019ouvrage de recourir \u00e0 [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1776\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"994\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"believeco\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"believeco\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"believeco\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/ae50f6e0b1c66658587aa8d9d9252892\"},\"headline\":\"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/\"},\"wordCount\":826,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Bulletin droit de la construction et infrastructures\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/\",\"name\":\"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg\",\"width\":1776,\"height\":994,\"caption\":\"three people wearing hardhats standing at a construction site\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/ae50f6e0b1c66658587aa8d9d9252892\",\"name\":\"believeco\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0630e548257b5beb2605be4633af29f897bd2b9a93553a9f26c61b3b65763899?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0630e548257b5beb2605be4633af29f897bd2b9a93553a9f26c61b3b65763899?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"believeco\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables | Miller Thomson","og_description":"Journal Constructo \u2013 10 d\u00e9cembre 2020 Les appels d\u2019offres publics contiennent g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement une clause dite \u00ab\u00a0de r\u00e9serve\u00a0\u00bb par laquelle le donneur d\u2019ouvrage se m\u00e9nage la possibilit\u00e9 de ne retenir aucune soumission ou de ne pas retenir la plus basse soumission re\u00e7ue. Bien que les tribunaux aient reconnu le droit du donneur d\u2019ouvrage de recourir \u00e0 [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1776,"height":994,"url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"believeco","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"believeco","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/"},"author":{"name":"believeco","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/ae50f6e0b1c66658587aa8d9d9252892"},"headline":"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables","datePublished":"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/"},"wordCount":826,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg","articleSection":["Bulletin droit de la construction et infrastructures"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/","name":"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg","datePublished":"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Construction-Infrastructure_Post-Image.jpg","width":1776,"height":994,"caption":"three people wearing hardhats standing at a construction site"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/perspectives-juridiques\/bulletin-droit-de-la-construction-et-fr\/recours-a-la-clause-de-reserve-un-rappel-des-criteres-applicables\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Recours \u00e0 la clause de r\u00e9serve : un rappel des crit\u00e8res applicables"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/","name":"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/ae50f6e0b1c66658587aa8d9d9252892","name":"believeco","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0630e548257b5beb2605be4633af29f897bd2b9a93553a9f26c61b3b65763899?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0630e548257b5beb2605be4633af29f897bd2b9a93553a9f26c61b3b65763899?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"believeco"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/100"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11354\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11354"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=11354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}