{"id":52787,"date":"2026-05-25T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-25T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/deals-cases\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/"},"modified":"2026-07-07T11:49:16","modified_gmt":"2026-07-07T15:49:16","slug":"staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee","status":"publish","type":"deals-cases","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/","title":{"rendered":"Staples v. Jean \u2013 La Cour d\u2019appel confirme le rejet de la demande visant la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Le 25&nbsp;mai&nbsp;2026, Peter Askew a obtenu gain de cause devant la Cour d\u2019appel de l\u2019Ontario dans l\u2019affaire <em>Staples v. Jean, <\/em>2026&nbsp;ONCA&nbsp;369, o\u00f9 il repr\u00e9sentant Tiffany Jean en sa qualit\u00e9 d\u2019administratrice de la succession.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Le tribunal de premi\u00e8re instance avait rejet\u00e9 la demande des demandeurs visant la r\u00e9vocation de Tiffany Jean \u00e0 titre d\u2019administratrice de la succession et retenu son interpr\u00e9tation de la clause de rapport successoral dans les testaments du d\u00e9funt, rejetant celle des demandeurs. La Cour d\u2019appel a confirm\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019unanimit\u00e9 la d\u00e9cision du tribunal de premi\u00e8re instance, r\u00e9affirmant ainsi le seuil \u00e9lev\u00e9 applicable \u00e0 la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession. Elle a conclu qu\u2019aucun motif ne justifiait son intervention \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de la clause de rapport successoral retenue par le tribunal de premi\u00e8re instance (point conc\u00e9d\u00e9 par les appelants en appel) et a rejet\u00e9 la tentative des appelants de soulever de nouvelles questions qui n\u2019avaient pas \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es en premi\u00e8re instance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>L\u2019appel a \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9 et les d\u00e9pens ont \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9s \u00e0 Tiffany Jean et aux autres intim\u00e9s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>L\u2019\u00e9quipe de Miller Thomson qui a repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 Tiffany Jean \u00e9tait dirig\u00e9e par Peter Askew (Successions et fiducies).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":125,"template":"","class_list":["post-52787","deals-cases","type-deals-cases","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Staples v. Jean \u2013 La Cour d\u2019appel confirme le rejet de la demande visant la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Staples v. Jean \u2013 La Cour d\u2019appel confirme le rejet de la demande visant la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 25&nbsp;mai&nbsp;2026, Peter Askew a obtenu gain de cause devant la Cour d\u2019appel de l\u2019Ontario dans l\u2019affaire Staples v. Jean, 2026&nbsp;ONCA&nbsp;369, o\u00f9 il repr\u00e9sentant Tiffany Jean en sa qualit\u00e9 d\u2019administratrice de la succession. Le tribunal de premi\u00e8re instance avait rejet\u00e9 la demande des demandeurs visant la r\u00e9vocation de Tiffany Jean \u00e0 titre d\u2019administratrice de la [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-07T15:49:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/transactions-et-causes\\\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/transactions-et-causes\\\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\\\/\",\"name\":\"Staples v. Jean \u2013 La Cour d\u2019appel confirme le rejet de la demande visant la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-25T15:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-07T15:49:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/transactions-et-causes\\\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/transactions-et-causes\\\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/transactions-et-causes\\\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Transactions et mandats\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/transactions-et-causes\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Staples v. Jean \u2013 La Cour d\u2019appel confirme le rejet de la demande visant la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/MillerThomsonLaw\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/millerthomson\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/miller-thomson-llp\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@millerthomson\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Staples v. Jean \u2013 La Cour d\u2019appel confirme le rejet de la demande visant la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Staples v. Jean \u2013 La Cour d\u2019appel confirme le rejet de la demande visant la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession | Miller Thomson","og_description":"Le 25&nbsp;mai&nbsp;2026, Peter Askew a obtenu gain de cause devant la Cour d\u2019appel de l\u2019Ontario dans l\u2019affaire Staples v. Jean, 2026&nbsp;ONCA&nbsp;369, o\u00f9 il repr\u00e9sentant Tiffany Jean en sa qualit\u00e9 d\u2019administratrice de la succession. Le tribunal de premi\u00e8re instance avait rejet\u00e9 la demande des demandeurs visant la r\u00e9vocation de Tiffany Jean \u00e0 titre d\u2019administratrice de la [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_modified_time":"2026-07-07T15:49:16+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/","name":"Staples v. Jean \u2013 La Cour d\u2019appel confirme le rejet de la demande visant la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-25T15:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-07T15:49:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/staples-v-jean-court-of-appeal-confirms-dismissal-of-motion-to-remove-estate-trustee\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Transactions et mandats","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/transactions-et-causes\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Staples v. Jean \u2013 La Cour d\u2019appel confirme le rejet de la demande visant la r\u00e9vocation d\u2019un administrateur de succession"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/","name":"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson | Cabinet de droit des affaires pancanadien"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/deals-cases\/52787","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/deals-cases"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/deals-cases"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/125"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/deals-cases\/52787\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52788,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/deals-cases\/52787\/revisions\/52788"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}