Teneil MacNeil

Associée | Kitchener-Waterloo

519.593.3235

Portrait de Teneil MacNeil

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Teneil MacNeil is an experienced insurance lawyer whose practice includes the defence of personal injury claims, property damage claims, commercial general liability matters, and subrogated recovery matters. She also has experience with Workplace Safety and Insurance Board matters and is currently in the process of obtaining her Canadian Risk Management Program (CRM) designation. Teneil has proven herself as a capable and passionate trial lawyer during numerous appearances before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Ontario Small Claims Court, and various boards and tribunals.

Aucun résultat. Modifiez vos critères de recherche et essayez de nouveau.

Affichage de 1 à 1 sur 1

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Caroline Meyer, Teneil Macneil and Daniel Strigberger discuss hot insurance law topics on a panel at a Kitchener-Waterloo Ontario Insurance Adjusters Association dinner meeting.

Plus

Affichage de 1 à 1 sur 1
Affichage de 1 à 2 sur 2

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Off the Beaten Track

Dan Strigberger and Teneil MacNeil present « Off the Beaten Track » at an OMIA Workshop sponsored by Miller Thomson.

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Ontario Mutual Insurers’ Association: Annual Workshop

Miller Thomson’s Southwestern Ontario Insurance Group presents their Annual Workshop at the Ontario Mutual Insurers’ Association facility. Katie Quinlan, Bryan Horrigan, Daniel Strigberger, Pat Forte, James Prior, Teneil MacNeil, Talaal Bond and Caroline Meyer present at the event.

Plus

Affichage de 1 à 2 sur 2
Affichage de 1 à 10 sur 10

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Where a Plaintiff is Ordinarily Resident Outside of Ontario, Under What Circumstances will a Court Order Security for Costs?

General Legal Principles Rule 56.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194 provides that the Court, on motion by a defendant in a proceeding, may make an order for security for costs where it appears that the...

Plus

Dog Walkers – Beware!

In the January 2017 Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Wilk v. Arbour, the Court was asked to determine when a person is considered to be in possession of a dog for the purposes of the Dog Owners’ Liability Act,...

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Slip & Fall Season and Recreational Trails – Franklin et. al. v The City of Greater Sudbury, 2016 ONSC 4739 (CanLII)

Slip and fall season is fast approaching, much to the dismay of many. Still, with winter comes breathtaking snow falls, making for picture walks along recreational trails, and otherwise within our communities. What happens when we fall on one of...

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Insurers Beware: Costs Awards Need NOT Be Proportional to Damage Awards

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has provided us with two reminders this May that costs awards need not be proportional to damage awards, as exemplified by the cases below. In Mancini Associates LLP v. Guido et al., 2016 ONSC...

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Unidentified Automobile Coverage and Relief from Forfeiture in the Face of Non-Compliance with Reporting Requirements

The Court of Appeal, in the case of Dams v. TD Home and Auto Insurance Company, 2016 ONCA 4 (CanLII), has reminded us of the law with respect to unidentified automobile insurance coverage in Ontario, particularly as it pertains to...

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Guaranteed Replacement Cost Coverage Denied When Insureds Decide to Relocate

March 11, 2009 – a disastrous day for Mr. and Mrs. Willoughby. Their home was destroyed by fire. And while they might have moved back and had their home rebuilt, they instead decided to relocate. This decision had a consequence...

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Court: Plaintiff can Corroborate Doctor’s Evidence for Threshold Motion

In an interesting case heard on March 20, 2013, Ontario’s Divisional Court was faced with the question of whether or not a plaintiff is precluded from corroborating a physician’s evidence in relation to change of function, in the context of...

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

To Defend, or Not to Defend, That is the Question ….

Vishal Malaviya (“VN”) was covered under Ontario’s Statutory AutomobilePolicy (the “SAP”) for motor vehicle insurance through Jevco Insurance Company (“Jevco”), having opted for the minimum liability limit of $200,000, and having been sued for an amount in excess of same...

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Guilty Verdicts Matter

With the start of the new year comes a helpful reminder as to the significance of criminal and quasi-criminal verdicts in related civil proceedings. This is thanks to the Honourable Justice J. O’Connor who, on January 3, 2013, determined that...

Plus

( Disponible en anglais seulement )

Grandma isn’t Always to Blame

Juliet Bratanov’s 18 year old grandson used her van to run-down and kill Kevin Persaud after a drug deal gone bad. Persaud’s family consequently commenced an action against Bratanov claiming that Bratanov was vicariously liable for the actions of her...

Plus

Affichage de 1 à 10 sur 10

Aucun résultat. Modifiez vos critères de recherche et essayez de nouveau.