{"id":6885,"date":"2022-01-11T22:32:23","date_gmt":"2022-01-12T03:32:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/"},"modified":"2026-03-06T18:57:33","modified_gmt":"2026-03-06T23:57:33","slug":"court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In an Ontario Court of Appeal decision released last week,<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> Brown J.A. granted the Appellant\u2019s motion for leave to file a reply factum of five pages, and recommended that the <em>Rules of Civil Procedure<\/em> be amended to permit appellants to file brief reply facta, without having to seek leave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Currently, Rule 61.16 requires appellants to bring a motion for leave to file a reply factum (Ontario\u2019s criminal rules of appellate procedure have similar requirements for appeals that are not in writing, as well). According to Justice Brown in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onca\/doc\/2022\/2022onca4\/2022onca4.html?autocompleteStr=2022%20ONCA%204&amp;autocompletePos=1#document\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Prism Resources Inc. v. Detour Gold Corporation [Prism Resources]<\/em><\/a>, this Rule causes inefficiency and unnecessary costs:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>On a motion for leave to file a reply factum, the appellant must, at minimum, file a motion record and factum \u2013 that\u2019s right, a factum for permission to file a factum, even where the motion is unopposed or on consent. All of this involves costs to the appellant and occupies judicial resources;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Appeal Court panels are often presented with reply arguments at the oral hearing. As Justice Brown states, this frequently requires longer oral hearing allocations, which would be shortened with a properly briefed written record;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>When appellants do not file a reply factum and instead present their reply arguments orally at the hearing, the Court is prevented from gleaning in advance a firm understanding of the significant arguments to be made.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>There are many legitimate reasons why an appellant might want to file a reply factum on appeal, including the appellant wishes to address something raised in the respondent\u2019s appeal factum, the appellant wishes to clarify its articulation of an argument in anticipation of the oral hearing, or the appellant wishes to reply to arguments raised by a respondent in a cross-appeal. In <em>Prism Resources<\/em>, the appellant sought to file a reply factum in response to an argument advanced in the respondent\u2019s appeal factum, which was not dealt with by the motion judge, thus not addressed by the appellant in its main factum. As noted by Justice Brown, filing a reply factum in any of these situations would serve the goal of ensuring Appellate Judges can firmly understand the key arguments before the oral hearing and that the parties are appearing before a fully briefed court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Prism Resources<\/em> is a important decision in recognizing the importance of appellants\u2019 right to written reply in both civil and criminal appeals. Should the <em>Rules of Civil Procedure<\/em> be amended as recommended by Justice Brown, this will have important implications for counsel appearing before the Court of Appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>This article was authored by a former Partner with Miller Thomson. If you have any questions, please reach out to a member of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/expertise\/commercial-litigation\/\">Commercial Litigation<\/a> group. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> <em>Prism Resources Inc. v Detour Gold<\/em> Corporation, 2022 ONCA 4.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an Ontario Court of Appeal decision released last week,[1] Brown J.A. granted the Appellant\u2019s motion for leave to file a reply factum of five pages, and recommended that the Rules of Civil Procedure be amended to permit appellants to file brief reply facta, without having to seek leave. Currently, Rule 61.16 requires appellants to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14399,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[545],"insight-format":[415],"class_list":["post-6885","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commercial-litigation"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In an Ontario Court of Appeal decision released last week,[1] Brown J.A. granted the Appellant\u2019s motion for leave to file a reply factum of five pages, and recommended that the Rules of Civil Procedure be amended to permit appellants to file brief reply facta, without having to seek leave. Currently, Rule 61.16 requires appellants to [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-01-12T03:32:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-06T23:57:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3f9143e8aec04617923b89fecf6886ea\"},\"headline\":\"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-12T03:32:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-06T23:57:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/\"},\"wordCount\":479,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insigths_Commercial-Litigation_Post-Image.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Commercial Litigation\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/\",\"name\":\"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insigths_Commercial-Litigation_Post-Image.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-12T03:32:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-06T23:57:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insigths_Commercial-Litigation_Post-Image.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insigths_Commercial-Litigation_Post-Image.jpg\",\"width\":1776,\"height\":994},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3f9143e8aec04617923b89fecf6886ea\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2fb85dacd7d0cf6d162ec9c30c25b90c6e69a82dbe5ebe52991d2ec0d73e4890?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2fb85dacd7d0cf6d162ec9c30c25b90c6e69a82dbe5ebe52991d2ec0d73e4890?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal | Miller Thomson","og_description":"In an Ontario Court of Appeal decision released last week,[1] Brown J.A. granted the Appellant\u2019s motion for leave to file a reply factum of five pages, and recommended that the Rules of Civil Procedure be amended to permit appellants to file brief reply facta, without having to seek leave. Currently, Rule 61.16 requires appellants to [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2022-01-12T03:32:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-06T23:57:33+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3f9143e8aec04617923b89fecf6886ea"},"headline":"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal","datePublished":"2022-01-12T03:32:23+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-06T23:57:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/"},"wordCount":479,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insigths_Commercial-Litigation_Post-Image.jpg","articleSection":["Commercial Litigation"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/","name":"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insigths_Commercial-Litigation_Post-Image.jpg","datePublished":"2022-01-12T03:32:23+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-06T23:57:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insigths_Commercial-Litigation_Post-Image.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insigths_Commercial-Litigation_Post-Image.jpg","width":1776,"height":994},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/court-of-appeal-recommends-change-to-rules-of-civil-procedure-the-right-to-file-a-reply-factum-on-appeal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Court of Appeal recommends change to Rules of Civil Procedure: The right to file a reply factum on appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","name":"Miller Thomson","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3f9143e8aec04617923b89fecf6886ea","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2fb85dacd7d0cf6d162ec9c30c25b90c6e69a82dbe5ebe52991d2ec0d73e4890?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2fb85dacd7d0cf6d162ec9c30c25b90c6e69a82dbe5ebe52991d2ec0d73e4890?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6885","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6885"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6885\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47292,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6885\/revisions\/47292"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14399"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6885"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=6885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}