{"id":6617,"date":"2024-03-19T14:49:10","date_gmt":"2024-03-19T18:49:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/"},"modified":"2025-07-10T11:45:50","modified_gmt":"2025-07-10T15:45:50","slug":"supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/","title":{"rendered":"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

On March 1, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Bykovets<\/em><\/a>, finding that IP addresses attract a reasonable expectation of privacy.  Accordingly, corporations should take note that they have no legal obligation to provide the IP addresses of any customer to the police without a proper warrant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An IP address is a unique alphanumeric identification number that identifies the source of every online activity and connects that activity to a specific location.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this decision, the Calgary Police Service were investigating fraudulent online purchases from a liquor store. During the course of this investigation, the police contacted the third-party payment processing company, Moneris, and requested the IP addresses of the subscribers who had made the fraudulent purchases. Moneris provided the IP address information and police were able to identify Bykovets by obtaining a production order against the telecommunications provider for the names and addresses of subscribers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The suspect, Bykovets, brought a Charter<\/em> claim under section 8 which provides a right against unreasonable search and seizure. To claim protection under section 8 of the Charter<\/em>, the claimant must identify the subject matter of the search, have a direct interest in the subject matter, and demonstrate that the applicant had a subjective and objective reasonable expectation of privacy in the subject matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both the Alberta Court of the Queen\u2019s Bench and the Alberta Court of Appeal determined that the police\u2019s request to Moneris did not amount to a search under section 8 of the Charter<\/em> because there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in an Internet user\u2019s IP address as IP addresses alone do not reveal information about a person\u2019s lifestyle or core biographical information. Justice Veldhuis of the Alberta Court of Appeal dissented, noting that the police force was not seeking only <\/em>the IP address but rather the information the IP address could reveal about the specific Internet user.  Mr. Bykovets appealed to the SCC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SCC Decision<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The SCC reversed the trial and appellate decision, agreeing with Justice Veldhuis\u2019 dissent.  In doing so, the Court called an IP address \u201cthe key that can lead the state through the maze of a user\u2019s Internet activity,\u201d and \u201cthe first digital breadcrumb that can lead the state on the trail of an individual\u2019s Internet activity.\u201d As well, the Court emphasized the need to examine the user\u2019s expectation of privacy \u201cin relation to all the information this IP address \u2018tends to reveal.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In particular, the Court found an IP address is not just an abstract string of numbers that is used to obtain a production warrant against an Internet service provider but rather, it shares personal information about the user including their specific location, as well as a range of highly personal online activities, such as purchases, destinations the user visits, or political preferences. This information is not protected by a Spencer<\/em> warrant (a warrant that police must obtain before asking an Internet service provider to identify a specific user associated with an IP address). Among other factors, the Court also emphasized that the burden of obtaining a warrant for accessing IP addresses was not onerous. Section 8 protection simply protects against police accessing a user\u2019s online activities unrelated to the investigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Justice C\u00f4t\u00e9 dissented from the decision, stating that the subject matter of the search was the IP address and the identity of their associated Internet service provider, not the identity of the Internet user linked to the particular IP address. In addition, Justice C\u00f4t\u00e9 stated that IP addresses were not private nor did they reveal any private information, and that IP addresses must be combined with other information in order to provide any sensitive and personal information. Justice C\u00f4t\u00e9 cautioned that the section 8 analysis was contextual, and she was not foreclosing the possibility of someone having a reasonable expectation of privacy in IP addresses based on different facts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This decision constrains the government\u2019s surveillance powers in an increasingly digital world. It may come as a comfort to individuals that as their Internet activities are increasingly being tracked in ways they may not be aware by private entities, this information cannot be obtained by the police without a warrant. Internet service providers and other businesses should be aware that they have no legal obligation to provide the IP addresses of any customer to the police without the police first obtaining a proper warrant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Should you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to a member of Miller Thomson\u2019s Privacy, Data Protection and Cybersecurity<\/a> team.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On March 1, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Bykovets, finding that IP addresses attract a reasonable expectation of privacy.  Accordingly, corporations should take note that they have no legal obligation to provide the IP addresses of any customer to the police without a proper warrant. An IP address […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":14345,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[531],"insight-format":[418],"class_list":["post-6617","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cybersecurity"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nPrivacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On March 1, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Bykovets, finding that IP addresses attract a reasonable expectation of privacy.  Accordingly, corporations should take note that they have no legal obligation to provide the IP addresses of any customer to the police without a proper warrant. An IP address […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-03-19T18:49:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-07-10T15:45:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1776\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"994\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nyeisha Murray\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nyeisha Murray\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nyeisha Murray\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8c49b710501a2ba22438ca72fb0c0c85\"},\"headline\":\"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-19T18:49:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-10T15:45:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/\"},\"wordCount\":774,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cybersecurity\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/\",\"name\":\"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-03-19T18:49:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-07-10T15:45:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg\",\"width\":1776,\"height\":994,\"caption\":\"person in hoodie looking at a computer screen\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8c49b710501a2ba22438ca72fb0c0c85\",\"name\":\"Nyeisha Murray\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ec01113c3c7208ac683f05f5b7f25e187ddf5deabc82d0d9e12aeca8d3b9c851?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ec01113c3c7208ac683f05f5b7f25e187ddf5deabc82d0d9e12aeca8d3b9c851?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nyeisha Murray\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy | Miller Thomson","og_description":"On March 1, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Bykovets, finding that IP addresses attract a reasonable expectation of privacy.  Accordingly, corporations should take note that they have no legal obligation to provide the IP addresses of any customer to the police without a proper warrant. An IP address […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2024-03-19T18:49:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-07-10T15:45:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1776,"height":994,"url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nyeisha Murray","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nyeisha Murray","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/"},"author":{"name":"Nyeisha Murray","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8c49b710501a2ba22438ca72fb0c0c85"},"headline":"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy","datePublished":"2024-03-19T18:49:10+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-10T15:45:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/"},"wordCount":774,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg","articleSection":["Cybersecurity"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/","name":"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg","datePublished":"2024-03-19T18:49:10+00:00","dateModified":"2025-07-10T15:45:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Cybersecurity_Post-Image.jpg","width":1776,"height":994,"caption":"person in hoodie looking at a computer screen"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/cybersecurity\/supreme-court-of-canada-decision-regarding-ip-address-privacy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Privacy prevails: The Supreme Court of Canada\u2019s landmark decision regarding IP address privacy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","name":"Miller Thomson","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8c49b710501a2ba22438ca72fb0c0c85","name":"Nyeisha Murray","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ec01113c3c7208ac683f05f5b7f25e187ddf5deabc82d0d9e12aeca8d3b9c851?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ec01113c3c7208ac683f05f5b7f25e187ddf5deabc82d0d9e12aeca8d3b9c851?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nyeisha Murray"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6617"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6617\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14345"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6617"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=6617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}