{"id":6523,"date":"2023-11-14T14:23:45","date_gmt":"2023-11-14T19:23:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/"},"modified":"2025-09-11T12:56:26","modified_gmt":"2025-09-11T16:56:26","slug":"adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/","title":{"rendered":"<i>Adboss<\/i>: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A recent decision of the Federal Court of Appeal has determined that when a matter of mixed fact and law is assumed by the Minister and the taxpayer requests the information the Minister based their assumption on, the Minister must provide the information or the assumption may be struck from their reply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Assumptions of the Minister are important in an appeal to the Tax Court of Canada because they will be taken as fact, with the initial onus on the taxpayer to demolish the assumption. If the Minister\u2019s assumptions do not contain sufficient information and detail, the taxpayer will not know the case to be met.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In <em>Canada v. Adboss Ltd.<\/em>, the Minister of National Revenue (the \u201c<strong>Minister<\/strong>\u201d) appealed three decisions made by the Tax Court of Canada to the Federal Court of Appeal: <em>Adboss Ltd. <\/em>(\u201c<strong>Adboss<\/strong>\u201d)<em>, Liberty Street Management Ltd., <\/em>and <em>Bluecove Management Ltd <\/em>(the \u201c<strong>Respondents<\/strong>\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Facts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Minister reassessed the Respondents on the basis that they should have collected GST\/HST for services provided to certain recipients the Minister considered to be resident in Canada (the \u201c<strong>Recipients<\/strong>\u201d).&nbsp; The Respondents filed&nbsp; notices of appeal in the Tax Court, to which the Minister replied. One of the assumptions in each reply (the \u201c<strong>Impugned Assumption<\/strong>\u201d) read:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>[At] all material times, the controlling mind and management of [the Recipients] was<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>in Canada.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>The Respondents requested particulars from the Minister on the Impugned Assumption twice, but were denied each time. The Respondents then filed a motion to strike the Impugned Assumption on the basis that it was a statement of mixed fact and law, and therefore it could not be included in assumptions of fact made by the Minister when making assessments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Lower Court findings<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Tax Court found that the Impugned Assumption should be struck on the basis that a pleading may be struck if it \u201cmay prejudice or delay the fair hearing of the appeal\u201d or \u201cis an abuse of the process of the [Tax] Court\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/800t#sec53\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">under R. 53(1)(a)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/800t#sec53\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">R. 53(1)(c)<\/a> of the <em>Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure<\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Minister appealed the decision to the Federal Court of Appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Court of Appeal<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Federal Court of Appeal (\u201c<strong>FCA<\/strong>\u201d) upheld the decision of the Tax Court, finding in favour of Adboss.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The FCA agreed with the Tax Court that the question of where the \u201ccontrolling mind and management\u201d of a corporation is located is a question of mixed fact and law, because it requires applying a legal test to a set of facts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The FCA further found that striking out the Impuged Assumption was not an overriding and palpable error.&nbsp; In making this conclusion, the FCA noted that R. 49(1)(d) requires the Minister\u2019s reply to a notice of appeal to state \u201c\u2026 the assumptions of fact made by the Minister when making the assessment\u201d. The FCA found that the Impugned Assumption was not an assumption of fact, and in doing so noted the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201clegal statements or conclusions of law have no place in the Minister\u2019s factual assumptions\u2026 Similarly, factual elements in a statement of mixed fact and law should be extricated, so that the taxpayer knows exactly what factual assumptions it must demolish in order to succeed\u2026 That said, not every conclusion of mixed fact and law that appears as an assumption must necessarily be struck.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>The FCA cited <em>Eisbrenner v Canada<\/em> as the authority on when deficient pleadings may be allowed to stand:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>When assumptions of mixed fact and law are tangential to the legal issues in dispute;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>When assumptions will not cause prejudice to the taxpayer;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>When the facts are simple; or<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>When letting the deficient pleadings stand better serves the trial process.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>The Minister\u2019s refusal to provide particulars in respect of an element of her pleadings that went to the heart of the appeal gave rise to unwarranted, costs and time, and delayed the hearing of the appeal. Adboss was \u201cleft to speculate as to the facts underlying the conclusion of mixed fact and law of the Minister that the \u2018controlling mind and management [of the Recipients] was in Canada\u201d, which lead to the Tax Court\u2019s conclusion of prejudice to the taxpayer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The FCA also acknowledged the broader consequences of their decision, stating that the Court will not necessarily strike all assumptions of mixed fact and law. As stated in <em>Eisbrenner<\/em>, if the statements of mixed fact and law do not go to the heart of the matter, then they will not be struck. Additionally, statements of mixed fact and law may stand where the facts are simple and the taxpayer is not left to speculate as to the basis of the Minister\u2019s assumption and the case to be met by the taxpayer. For example, stating a 5 year old child is a minor is an assumption of mixed fact and law, but the taxpayer is not left to speculate on the basis of that assumption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Adboss <\/em>reinforces that the Minister cannot simply assume complex matters of mixed fact and law, such as the residency of a corporation, without informing the taxpayer of the basis of their assumption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Should you find yourself subject to a CRA assessment, we recommend contacting a member of Miller Thomson\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/expertise\/tax\/tax-disputes-resolution\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tax Disputes<\/a> Team.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent decision of the Federal Court of Appeal has determined that when a matter of mixed fact and law is assumed by the Minister and the taxpayer requests the information the Minister based their assumption on, the Minister must provide the information or the assumption may be struck from their reply. Assumptions of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":86,"featured_media":14343,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[551],"insight-format":[416],"class_list":["post-6523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-corporate-tax"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A recent decision of the Federal Court of Appeal has determined that when a matter of mixed fact and law is assumed by the Minister and the taxpayer requests the information the Minister based their assumption on, the Minister must provide the information or the assumption may be struck from their reply. Assumptions of the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-11-14T19:23:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-11T16:56:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nyeisha Murray\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nyeisha Murray\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nyeisha Murray\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8c49b710501a2ba22438ca72fb0c0c85\"},\"headline\":\"Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-14T19:23:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-11T16:56:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/\"},\"wordCount\":884,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Corporate-tax_Post-Image.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Corporate Tax\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/\",\"name\":\"Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Corporate-tax_Post-Image.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-14T19:23:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-11T16:56:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Corporate-tax_Post-Image.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Corporate-tax_Post-Image.jpg\",\"width\":1776,\"height\":994},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8c49b710501a2ba22438ca72fb0c0c85\",\"name\":\"Nyeisha Murray\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ec01113c3c7208ac683f05f5b7f25e187ddf5deabc82d0d9e12aeca8d3b9c851?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ec01113c3c7208ac683f05f5b7f25e187ddf5deabc82d0d9e12aeca8d3b9c851?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nyeisha Murray\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law | Miller Thomson","og_description":"A recent decision of the Federal Court of Appeal has determined that when a matter of mixed fact and law is assumed by the Minister and the taxpayer requests the information the Minister based their assumption on, the Minister must provide the information or the assumption may be struck from their reply. Assumptions of the [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2023-11-14T19:23:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-11T16:56:26+00:00","author":"Nyeisha Murray","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nyeisha Murray","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/"},"author":{"name":"Nyeisha Murray","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8c49b710501a2ba22438ca72fb0c0c85"},"headline":"Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law","datePublished":"2023-11-14T19:23:45+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-11T16:56:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/"},"wordCount":884,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Corporate-tax_Post-Image.jpg","articleSection":["Corporate Tax"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/","name":"Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Corporate-tax_Post-Image.jpg","datePublished":"2023-11-14T19:23:45+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-11T16:56:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Corporate-tax_Post-Image.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Corporate-tax_Post-Image.jpg","width":1776,"height":994},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/corporate-tax\/adboss-assume-issues-mixed-fact-and-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Adboss: The Minister cannot simply assume issues of mixed fact and law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","name":"Miller Thomson","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/8c49b710501a2ba22438ca72fb0c0c85","name":"Nyeisha Murray","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ec01113c3c7208ac683f05f5b7f25e187ddf5deabc82d0d9e12aeca8d3b9c851?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ec01113c3c7208ac683f05f5b7f25e187ddf5deabc82d0d9e12aeca8d3b9c851?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nyeisha Murray"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/86"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6523"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6523\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14343"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6523"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=6523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}