{"id":6475,"date":"2023-08-23T12:01:47","date_gmt":"2023-08-23T16:01:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/"},"modified":"2025-09-12T18:41:39","modified_gmt":"2025-09-12T22:41:39","slug":"bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/","title":{"rendered":"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Two recent decisions from the Supreme Court of British Columbia have highlighted particular requirements and certain barriers in relation to obtaining an order to compel a plaintiff\u2019s attendance at an independent medical examination (<strong><em>\u201cIME\u201d<\/em><\/strong>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In <em>Gysbers v. Patkunalingam<\/em>, 2023 BCSC 1278 (\u201c<strong><em>Gysbers<\/em><\/strong>\u201d), the defendant in a motor vehicle accident claim sought an order for the plaintiff to attend an IME with a neurologist. The court denied this application for two reasons. First, the application was not brought in a timely manner. The IME application was brought only six weeks before the service deadline, which did not leave sufficient time for the neurologist to prepare a report. Second, the plaintiff had already seen a psychiatrist whose report indicated that the plaintiff had \u201cno neurological symptoms.\u201d The court determined that there was no need for further neurological examination, and found that the urgency of the application was not justified. Therefore, the court declined to grant the defendant\u2019s application for an order compelling the plaintiff to attend an IME.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In <em>Guo v. Stevenson<\/em>, 2023 BCSC 1284 (\u201c<strong><em>Guo<\/em><\/strong>\u201d), the plaintiff claimed to have suffered from tinnitus as a result of a motor vehicle accident. Although the plaintiff had already organized and attended three IMEs, including two with ear, nose, and throat specialists, the defendant applied for their own IME to address the cost of care as claimed by the plaintiff. However, the court found that this fourth IME was unnecessary, as it was not needed to \u201cput the parties on equal footing.\u201d Most of the plaintiff\u2019s symptoms had largely subsided by the time of the application, with the exception of her tinnitus, which was her only lingering injury. The proposed examination was unrelated to her tinnitus, and the plaintiff\u2019s previous examinations had sufficiently covered that symptom. Therefore, Master Schwartz ruled that the proposed assessment was neither proportionate nor necessary to put the parties on equal footing. The application was therefore denied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These decisions demonstrate that a party looking to obtain an order compelling a plaintiff to attend an IME must first consider the timeliness and utility of the IME. If the timing of the IME does not provide the expert with sufficient time to prepare their report, as in <strong><em>Gysbers<\/em><\/strong>, or the proposed examination is not necessary to put the parties on equal footing, as in <strong><em>Guo<\/em><\/strong>, the applicant risks their application being denied along with a potential award of costs associated with the failed application. Underwriters ought to be aware of these implications and counsel must determine, as early as possible, whether IMEs may be necessary for the proper defence of the claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to a member of Miller Thomson\u2019s&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/our-services\/services\/insurance-defence\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Insurance Defence<\/a>&nbsp;group.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Two recent decisions from the Supreme Court of British Columbia have highlighted particular requirements and certain barriers in relation to obtaining an order to compel a plaintiff\u2019s attendance at an independent medical examination (\u201cIME\u201d). In Gysbers v. Patkunalingam, 2023 BCSC 1278 (\u201cGysbers\u201d), the defendant in a motor vehicle accident claim sought an order for the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":14367,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[525],"insight-format":[418],"class_list":["post-6475","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insurance"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Two recent decisions from the Supreme Court of British Columbia have highlighted particular requirements and certain barriers in relation to obtaining an order to compel a plaintiff\u2019s attendance at an independent medical examination (\u201cIME\u201d). In Gysbers v. Patkunalingam, 2023 BCSC 1278 (\u201cGysbers\u201d), the defendant in a motor vehicle accident claim sought an order for the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-23T16:01:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-12T22:41:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1776\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"994\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Katherine Chan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Katherine Chan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Katherine Chan\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6\"},\"headline\":\"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-23T16:01:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-12T22:41:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/\"},\"wordCount\":470,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/\",\"name\":\"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-23T16:01:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-12T22:41:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg\",\"width\":1776,\"height\":994},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6\",\"name\":\"Katherine Chan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Katherine Chan\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination | Miller Thomson","og_description":"Two recent decisions from the Supreme Court of British Columbia have highlighted particular requirements and certain barriers in relation to obtaining an order to compel a plaintiff\u2019s attendance at an independent medical examination (\u201cIME\u201d). In Gysbers v. Patkunalingam, 2023 BCSC 1278 (\u201cGysbers\u201d), the defendant in a motor vehicle accident claim sought an order for the [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-23T16:01:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-12T22:41:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1776,"height":994,"url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Katherine Chan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Katherine Chan","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/"},"author":{"name":"Katherine Chan","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6"},"headline":"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination","datePublished":"2023-08-23T16:01:47+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-12T22:41:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/"},"wordCount":470,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg","articleSection":["Insurance"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/","name":"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg","datePublished":"2023-08-23T16:01:47+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-12T22:41:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg","width":1776,"height":994},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/bc-supreme-court-requirements-order-independent-medical-examination\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"BC Supreme Court comments on requirements to obtain an order compelling an independent medical examination"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","name":"Miller Thomson","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6","name":"Katherine Chan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Katherine Chan"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6475"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6475\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6475"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=6475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}