{"id":6190,"date":"2022-09-08T08:15:00","date_gmt":"2023-08-12T08:04:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/"},"modified":"2025-12-29T19:04:06","modified_gmt":"2025-12-30T00:04:06","slug":"ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/","title":{"rendered":"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Ontario Court of Appeal recently upheld the dismissal of a class action under the Ontario <em>Securities Act <\/em>(the \u201cOSA\u201d) secondary market disclosure provisions in <em>Wong v Pretium Resources Inc, <\/em>2022 ONCA 549 (\u201c<em>Pretium<\/em>\u201d). <em>Pretium<\/em> is the first such action to receive leave and ultimately be decided on its merits. The decision serves as a reminder of the importance of building a strong evidentiary record to successfully argue a case in the highly fact-specific space of secondary market disclosure disputes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Background<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This class action arose from a four-month-long disagreement between Pretium, a mining exploration company, and Strathcona Mineral Services (\u201cStrathcona\u201d), one of their mining experts. Pretium did not wish to disclose Strathcona\u2019s concerns arising from early test results estimating a project\u2019s yield. Pretium\u2019s refusal to disclose led Strathcona to resign from the project. When Pretium announced Strathcona\u2019s resignation, Pretium\u2019s stock price fell by over half. The representative plaintiff shareholder sued Pretium for alleged misrepresentations by omission of material facts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Earlier decisions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2017, the plaintiff was granted leave, as required under s.138 of the OSA (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onsc\/doc\/2017\/2017onsc3361\/2017onsc3361.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2017 ONSC 3361<\/a>). The motion judge found the parties\u2019 evidence suggested this was a case of two respected mining professionals reasonably disagreeing on the interpretation and materiality of the test results. This met the threshold for leave as there was \u201ca reasonable possibility\u201d that the plaintiff would win at trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Following class certification in 2019, the parties brought cross-motions for summary judgment. The core issue to be decided was whether Pretium\u2019s failure to disclose Strathcona\u2019s concerns was an omission of a material fact under the OSA. With the benefit of additional evidence, the most probative of which came from Pretium, the motion judge found on a balance of probabilities in favour of the defence (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onsc\/doc\/2021\/2021onsc54\/2021onsc54.html\">2021 ONSC 54<\/a>). It was reasonable for Pretium to have considered Strathcona\u2019s concerns about the test results to be \u201cunsolicited, inexpert, premature, and unreliable,\u201d and therefore not material nor necessary to disclose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The appeal decision<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The main issue on appeal was the motion judge\u2019s consideration of the reliability of Strathcona\u2019s concerns and thus whether they were material facts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court held that reliability is properly a factor going to materiality. While the evidence available on the leave motion was that Strathcona and Pretium had differing subjective views regarding the reliability of the test results, the new evidence provided on summary judgment suggested that Strathcona\u2019s concerns were objectively unreliable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When weighing this new evidence and given the higher burden of proof on summary judgment, there was no error in the earlier decision to dismiss the action. This is the case despite the fact that the Court reached a different conclusion on the leave motion years earlier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This decision serves as a reminder to plaintiff\u2019s counsel that the evidence they successfully rely on to gain leave will not on its own be sufficient to persuade a judge of the merits of the claim. Defendants, too, ought not conflate a successful leave motion with a guarantee that liability for secondary market disclosure will be found.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>From a strategic perspective, the case reinforces the highly fact-specific nature of secondary market disclosure disputes and the importance of building a strong evidentiary record to successfully argue about the merits of a claim after leave is granted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p>Learn more about Miller Thomson&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/our-services\/services\/class-actions\/\">Class Actions<\/a> Group. Should you have any questions, please reach out to a member of our team.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Ontario Court of Appeal recently upheld the dismissal of a class action under the Ontario Securities Act (the \u201cOSA\u201d) secondary market disclosure provisions in Wong v Pretium Resources Inc, 2022 ONCA 549 (\u201cPretium\u201d). Pretium is the first such action to receive leave and ultimately be decided on its merits. The decision serves as a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":14335,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[573],"insight-format":[416],"class_list":["post-6190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-class-actions"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Ontario Court of Appeal recently upheld the dismissal of a class action under the Ontario Securities Act (the \u201cOSA\u201d) secondary market disclosure provisions in Wong v Pretium Resources Inc, 2022 ONCA 549 (\u201cPretium\u201d). Pretium is the first such action to receive leave and ultimately be decided on its merits. The decision serves as a [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-30T00:04:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1776\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"994\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Katherine Chan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Katherine Chan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Katherine Chan\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6\"},\"headline\":\"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-30T00:04:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/\"},\"wordCount\":577,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Class Actions\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/\",\"name\":\"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-30T00:04:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg\",\"width\":1776,\"height\":994},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6\",\"name\":\"Katherine Chan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Katherine Chan\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions | Miller Thomson","og_description":"The Ontario Court of Appeal recently upheld the dismissal of a class action under the Ontario Securities Act (the \u201cOSA\u201d) secondary market disclosure provisions in Wong v Pretium Resources Inc, 2022 ONCA 549 (\u201cPretium\u201d). Pretium is the first such action to receive leave and ultimately be decided on its merits. The decision serves as a [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-30T00:04:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1776,"height":994,"url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Katherine Chan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Katherine Chan","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/"},"author":{"name":"Katherine Chan","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6"},"headline":"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions","datePublished":"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-30T00:04:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/"},"wordCount":577,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg","articleSection":["Class Actions"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/","name":"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg","datePublished":"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-30T00:04:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Class-Actions_Post-Image.jpg","width":1776,"height":994},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/class-actions\/ontario-court-of-appeal-securities-class-actions-wong-v-pretium-resources-inc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ontario Court of Appeal weighs in on securities class actions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","name":"Miller Thomson","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6","name":"Katherine Chan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Katherine Chan"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6190","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6190"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6190\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6190"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=6190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}