{"id":5745,"date":"2020-11-06T11:40:59","date_gmt":"2023-08-12T08:04:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/"},"modified":"2026-01-20T13:29:33","modified_gmt":"2026-01-20T18:29:33","slug":"r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/","title":{"rendered":"<i>R. v. Canfield: Customs Act<\/i> provision struck down on Charter grounds"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ab\/abca\/doc\/2020\/2020abca383\/2020abca383.html#_Toc54690632\">R. v. Canfield, 2020 ABCA 383<\/a><\/em>, the Alberta Court of Appeal considered the constitutionality of paragraph 99(1)(a) of the <em>Customs Act <\/em>(Canada) (the \u201c<strong>Act<\/strong>\u201d). Mr. Canfield and Mr. Townsend, who are both Canadian citizens, arrived at the Edmonton International Airport from outside of Canada. After questioning, the Canada Border Services Agency (the \u201c<strong>CBSA<\/strong>\u201d) performed a search of their respective electronic devices, which revealed photographs and videos containing child pornography. Mr. Canfield and Mr. Townsend were arrested.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At trial, Mr. Canfield and Mr. Townsend were convicted of possession of child pornography. On appeal, counsel for Mr. Canfield and Mr. Townsend argued, among other things, that paragraph 99(1)(a) of the Act was unconstitutional, as it permitted unlimited searches of electronic devices at the border. Under paragraph 99(1)(a) of the Act, CBSA officers are permitted to examine goods that have been brought into Canada. Based on a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ca\/scc\/doc\/1988\/1988canlii12\/1988canlii12.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Supreme Court of Canada case from 1988<\/a>, this provision has been interpreted to allow CBSA officers to search personal electronic devices without restriction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on the fact that there have been significant developments in the law respecting electronic devices over the past 30 years, the Alberta Court of Appeal revisited the issue. Ultimately, the Court found that paragraph 99(1)(a) of the Act was unconstitutional to the extent that it imposed no limits on the searches of electronic devices at the border. The Court held that the validity of paragraph 99(1)(a) would be of no force and effect for a period of one year insofar as it allowed for the unrestricted search of electronic devices. This one-year period was provided to allow Parliament the opportunity to amend the Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>Note<\/em><\/strong><em>: The convictions of Mr. Canfield and Mr. Townsend were nonetheless upheld based on the Court\u2019s finding that society\u2019s confidence in the justice system was best maintained through the admission of the evidence obtained through the unconstitutional searches.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you have any questions about this case or your rights at the border, please contact a member of our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/expertise\/tax\/global-trade-customs\/\">Global Trade and Customs group.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In R. v. Canfield, 2020 ABCA 383, the Alberta Court of Appeal considered the constitutionality of paragraph 99(1)(a) of the Customs Act (Canada) (the \u201cAct\u201d). Mr. Canfield and Mr. Townsend, who are both Canadian citizens, arrived at the Edmonton International Airport from outside of Canada. After questioning, the Canada Border Services Agency (the \u201cCBSA\u201d) performed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":100,"featured_media":14361,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[571],"insight-format":[416],"class_list":["post-5745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-global-trade-customs"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In R. v. Canfield, 2020 ABCA 383, the Alberta Court of Appeal considered the constitutionality of paragraph 99(1)(a) of the Customs Act (Canada) (the \u201cAct\u201d). Mr. Canfield and Mr. Townsend, who are both Canadian citizens, arrived at the Edmonton International Airport from outside of Canada. After questioning, the Canada Border Services Agency (the \u201cCBSA\u201d) performed [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-20T18:29:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1776\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"994\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"believeco\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"believeco\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"believeco\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/ae50f6e0b1c66658587aa8d9d9252892\"},\"headline\":\"R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-20T18:29:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/\"},\"wordCount\":345,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Global Trade and Customs\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/\",\"name\":\"R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-20T18:29:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg\",\"width\":1776,\"height\":994,\"caption\":\"stack of shipping containers.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/ae50f6e0b1c66658587aa8d9d9252892\",\"name\":\"believeco\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0630e548257b5beb2605be4633af29f897bd2b9a93553a9f26c61b3b65763899?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0630e548257b5beb2605be4633af29f897bd2b9a93553a9f26c61b3b65763899?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"believeco\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds | Miller Thomson","og_description":"In R. v. Canfield, 2020 ABCA 383, the Alberta Court of Appeal considered the constitutionality of paragraph 99(1)(a) of the Customs Act (Canada) (the \u201cAct\u201d). Mr. Canfield and Mr. Townsend, who are both Canadian citizens, arrived at the Edmonton International Airport from outside of Canada. After questioning, the Canada Border Services Agency (the \u201cCBSA\u201d) performed [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-20T18:29:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1776,"height":994,"url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"believeco","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"believeco","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/"},"author":{"name":"believeco","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/ae50f6e0b1c66658587aa8d9d9252892"},"headline":"R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds","datePublished":"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-20T18:29:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/"},"wordCount":345,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg","articleSection":["Global Trade and Customs"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/","name":"R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg","datePublished":"2023-08-12T08:04:04+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-20T18:29:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Global-Trade-Customs_Post-Image.jpg","width":1776,"height":994,"caption":"stack of shipping containers."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/global-trade-customs\/r-v-canfield-customs-act-provision-struck-down-on-charter-grounds\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R. v. Canfield: Customs Act provision struck down on Charter grounds"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","name":"Miller Thomson","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/ae50f6e0b1c66658587aa8d9d9252892","name":"believeco","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0630e548257b5beb2605be4633af29f897bd2b9a93553a9f26c61b3b65763899?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0630e548257b5beb2605be4633af29f897bd2b9a93553a9f26c61b3b65763899?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"believeco"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/100"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5745\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14361"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5745"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=5745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}