{"id":55713,"date":"2026-09-28T14:09:00","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T18:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/?p=55713"},"modified":"2026-09-29T14:42:53","modified_gmt":"2026-09-29T18:42:53","slug":"canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/","title":{"rendered":"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Who this is for: <\/strong>CFOs, GCs, and boards of foreign companies with Canadian subsidiaries showing signs of financial stress, and foreign lenders and creditors with exposure to Canadian debtors. Canada&#8217;s restructuring framework is sophisticated, court-supervised, and capable of handling complex cross-border situations. But it operates differently from Chapter 11, the UK&#8217;s restructuring plan, and most other foreign regimes in ways that materially affect what the foreign parent, lender, and creditor can do, and how quickly they need to act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Financial distress at a Canadian subsidiary is rarely just a Canadian subsidiary problem.&nbsp;A foreign parent may begin from two flawed assumptions:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>That the subsidiary&#8217;s separate corporate existence isolates the parent from the insolvency; and&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If formal protection becomes necessary, Canada&#8217;s restructuring regime will operate broadly like Chapter 11 or the restructuring process with which the parent is familiar at home.&nbsp;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Neither assumption is a safe basis for planning.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court of Canada recently reaffirmed the policy behind Canadian insolvency law in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/fr\/ca\/csc\/doc\/2022\/2022csc41\/2022csc41.html?resultId=a300ee05766b4e2294a60e819f762842&amp;searchId=2026-08-17T13:51:35:789\/4375d23796fb4ff2ae998d57a7ee15ef&amp;searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAsUGVhY2UgUml2ZXIgSHlkcm8gUGFydG5lcnMgdi4gUGV0cm93ZXN0IENvcnAAAAAAAQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Peace River Hydro Partners v. Petrowest Corp<\/em><\/a>.: stakeholder rights are generally channelled into a centralized &#8220;single proceeding&#8221; so that an insolvency can be administered efficiently rather than through a collection of competing enforcement actions.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For foreign companies, the more important questions are what falls inside that collective proceeding and what does not, and whether enough liquidity remains to choose the process rather than have one imposed by events.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In this article<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8d39b2df wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"#filing\">What does a Canadian filing actually protect?<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#guarantees\">Parent and affiliate guarantees remain live<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#board\">The Canadian board is not simply an extension of head office<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#intercompany\">Intercompany transactions can be reviewed after the fact<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#ccaa-bia\">CCAA or BIA? Which process fits the problem?<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#process\">Why choosing the wrong process costs real money<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#foreign-insolvency\">When does a foreign insolvency proceeding get recognized in Canada?<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#recognition\">Recognition has two questions: does the proceeding qualify, and is it main or non-main?<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#foreign-main\">What does foreign-main recognition actually give you?<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#non-main\">What if the foreign proceeding is non-main?<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#creditor\">If you are a foreign creditor, what rights &#8211;&nbsp;and deadline&nbsp;&#8211; matter most?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"#deadline\">The deadline most likely to be missed is the claims bar date<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#creditor-rights\">Some creditor rights expire even faster than a claims bar date<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#signals\">What signals tell a CFO to move from monitoring to restructuring planning?<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#options\">At the first warning signs, move from reporting to an options process<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#intervention\">The intervention that changes outcomes is funded optionality<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#quebec\">What changes when assets or operations are in Quebec?<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#ppsa\">Security is not a PPSA exercise<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#provincial\">The broader provincial trap is assuming one Canadian commercial law<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#bottom-line\">The bottom line<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"#takeaways\">Key takeaways<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/\">Read more on Doing Business in Canada<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" id=\"filing\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium)\">What does a Canadian filing actually protect?&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first mistake is equating separate corporate personality with total economic or legal insulation.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"guarantees\">Ordinarily, a shareholder is not liable simply because its subsidiary cannot pay its debts. But a CCAA stay or proceedings protecting the Canadian debtor does not automatically protect the foreign parent, other affiliates or every person associated with the corporate group.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Parent and affiliate guarantees remain live&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/C-36\/section-11.4.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Section 11.04 of the CCAA<\/a> makes the point directly: a CCAA stay does not, by itself, stop a creditor from proceeding against another person that has guaranteed the debtor&#8217;s obligation or issued a related letter of credit. The CCAA also permits a limited stay of certain claims against directors, but excludes claims based on guarantees personally given by them.<sup data-fn=\"89dbcd44-96d3-48ad-a161-a8a60b8b6165\" class=\"fn\"><a href=\"#89dbcd44-96d3-48ad-a161-a8a60b8b6165\" id=\"89dbcd44-96d3-48ad-a161-a8a60b8b6165-link\">1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"board\">For a foreign group, that means the first exposure map should extend beyond the Canadian entity&#8217;s accounts payable. It should identify parent and affiliate guarantees, shared credit facilities, cross-defaults, cash pooling, intercompany loans and security, comfort arrangements, shared contracts and any liabilities sitting with parent-appointed directors or officers.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Canadian board is not simply an extension of head office&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A second trap is governance. Parent-appointed directors of a Canadian corporation owe their statutory duties to the Canadian corporation, not to the shareholder that nominated them.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that the fiduciary duty is owed to the corporation and does not switch to creditors merely because the corporation approaches insolvency. At the same time, directors and officers can face specific statutory liabilities, including for certain employee wages and unremitted source deductions or GST\/HST, subject to the governing statutory conditions and defences.<sup data-fn=\"9b126603-6621-463d-9709-885d7f0015ad\" class=\"fn\"><a href=\"#9b126603-6621-463d-9709-885d7f0015ad\" id=\"9b126603-6621-463d-9709-885d7f0015ad-link\">2<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"intercompany\">In practice, a distressed multinational should separate the parent&#8217;s capital-allocation decision from the Canadian board&#8217;s decision-making process. Intercompany funding, asset transfers, management charges, cash sweeps and decisions about which obligations will be paid should be supported by a record showing what the Canadian company knew, what alternatives were considered, and why the decision was in the corporation&#8217;s interests.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Intercompany transactions can be reviewed after the fact&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This third exposure is historical. The point is not that ordinary intercompany activity becomes suspect simply because a subsidiary later restructures. It is that once distress is visible, moving cash or value around the group should be reviewed because:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/C-36\/section-36.1.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Section 36.1 of the CCAA<\/a> imports the BIA&#8217;s preference and transfer-at-undervalue remedies into a CCAA compromise or arrangement.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/b-3\/section-95.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Section 95 of the BIA<\/a> targets transactions that prefer one creditor over another: for a non-arm&#8217;s-length creditor, a payment, transfer, security grant or other listed transaction can be vulnerable if it occurred in the 12 months before the initial bankruptcy event and had the effect of giving that creditor a preference.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/b-3\/section-96.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Section 96 of the BIA<\/a> addresses transfers at undervalue and permits a court, in the statutory circumstances, to set the transaction aside or require value to be restored to the estate; for non-arm&#8217;s-length transactions, the review period can extend as far back as five years, subject to the statutory tests.<sup data-fn=\"ce567f79-338e-41ee-b510-080468b67f85\" class=\"fn\"><a href=\"#ce567f79-338e-41ee-b510-080468b67f85\" id=\"ce567f79-338e-41ee-b510-080468b67f85-link\">3<\/a><\/sup><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">CCAA or BIA? Which process fits the problem?&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The answer is not simply &#8220;CCAA for large companies and BIA for small companies.&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The CCAA has a statutory threshold &#8211; total claims must exceed $5 million for the debtor company or affiliated debtor companies proceeding together &#8211; but above that threshold the real choice is operational: what needs to be accomplished, how quickly, and with how much liquidity.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Decision point&nbsp;<\/th><th>CCAA&nbsp;<\/th><th>BIA Proposal \/ NOI&nbsp;<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Entry point<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Court application by an eligible debtor company; &gt;$5 million claims threshold.&nbsp;<\/td><td>An insolvent person can file an NOI before filing a proposal; no comparable $5 million threshold.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Stay<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Court-ordered; initial stay is capped at 10 days, then extended by further order if statutory requirements are met.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Filing an NOI generally produces a statutory stay under s. 69.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Oversight<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Mandatory court-appointed monitor; continuing supervision by the CCAA court.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Proposal trustee; more of the timetable and process is prescribed by statute.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Clock<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>No fixed overall statutory deadline for completing the restructuring, although continued stays require court approval and liquidity must support the process.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Cash-flow materials are due within 10 days after the NOI. A proposal is initially due within 30 days; extensions are capped at 45 days each and, in aggregate, five months beyond the initial period.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Failure&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>The court may lift the stay or the process may transition to a sale, receivership or bankruptcy depending on the circumstances.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Failure to meet the NOI filing requirements or proposal deadline results in a deemed assignment in bankruptcy.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Tools<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/td><td>Highly flexible; interim financing, sales, contract disclaimers, plans and other case-specific relief are available subject to the CCAA.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Not merely a &#8220;simple proposal&#8221; regime: the BIA also permits interim financing and court-authorized sales outside the ordinary course, but within a more prescriptive statutory framework.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This table outlines key differences between the CCAA and BIA, including eligibility, stay provisions, court oversight, restructuring timelines, consequences of failure, and available restructuring tools.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"process\" class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why choosing the wrong process costs real money&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An NOI proceeding under the BIA can be an efficient way to create immediate breathing room while the company negotiates a proposal, refinancing or transaction. But the statutory clock matters. Within 10 days of filing the NOI, the debtor must file prescribed cash-flow materials. The proposal is initially due within 30 days. The court may grant extensions only within the statutory limits and only if the debtor satisfies the statutory criteria, including good faith, due diligence, a likely viable proposal and lack of material prejudice to creditors. If the deadline expires without a proposal, the debtor is deemed to have made an assignment in bankruptcy.<sup data-fn=\"773e541c-58ea-4583-8a61-00dec3487974\" class=\"fn\"><a href=\"#773e541c-58ea-4583-8a61-00dec3487974\" id=\"773e541c-58ea-4583-8a61-00dec3487974-link\">4<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The CCAA offers more flexibility for a complex multi-entity or cross-border restructuring, but it is also court-intensive and requires a monitor. The professional and administrative cost can be disproportionate for a smaller or straightforward situation. Conversely, choosing a timetable that is too tight can force a distressed business to spend its remaining liquidity converting processes or responding to a bankruptcy consequence instead of executing the transaction.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"foreign-insolvency\">The regimes can interact. <a href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/c-36\/page-3.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Section 11.6 of the CCAA<\/a> permits a BIA proposal proceeding to be continued under the CCAA before a proposal is filed. That flexibility is useful, but it should be a contingency rather than the initial strategy. Every transition consumes time, management attention and cash.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When does a foreign insolvency proceeding get recognized in Canada?&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"recognition\">A Chapter 11 case, UK restructuring process or other foreign proceeding does not, merely by existing, create a Canadian stay or transfer control over Canadian property to the foreign court. Recognition is the bridge between the foreign proceeding and Canadian legal relief.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Recognition has two questions: does the proceeding qualify, and is it main or non-main?&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"foreign-main\">Under Part IV of the CCAA, the Canadian court must recognize a proceeding if it is a qualifying &#8220;foreign proceeding&#8221; and the applicant is its &#8220;foreign representative.&#8221; The court must then classify the proceeding as foreign main or foreign non-main. A main proceeding is one taking place where the debtor has its centre of main interests, or COMI. The debtor&#8217;s registered office is presumed to be its COMI unless the evidence shows otherwise.<sup data-fn=\"7b9401a9-63c7-475e-ab77-02714a7a00f8\" class=\"fn\"><a href=\"#7b9401a9-63c7-475e-ab77-02714a7a00f8\" id=\"7b9401a9-63c7-475e-ab77-02714a7a00f8-link\">5<\/a><\/sup> COMI is therefore not a corporate-organizational label. Canadian courts look to operational realities.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What does foreign-main recognition actually give you?&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If a CCAA foreign proceeding is recognized as main, section 48 requires the Canadian court, subject to appropriate terms, to grant a core package of protections: stays and restraints against proceedings involving the debtor and restrictions on dispositions of Canadian property outside the ordinary course. Section 49 then permits additional relief where necessary to protect the debtor&#8217;s property or creditor interests, including information and monitoring relief.<sup data-fn=\"aa5b053e-d878-4d25-b084-4a231543a705\" class=\"fn\"><a href=\"#aa5b053e-d878-4d25-b084-4a231543a705\" id=\"aa5b053e-d878-4d25-b084-4a231543a705-link\">6<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is the practical value of recognition: it gives the foreign restructuring a Canadian legal mechanism for the stay, asset protection, information-sharing, coordination and recognition of foreign-court orders that the foreign order could not automatically supply in Canada.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-base-2-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-container-core-group-is-layout-03cab32d wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium);padding-right:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium);padding-left:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium)\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A recent Miller Thomson example: Thentia Global Systems Inc. et al.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A recent cross-border example is <a href=\"https:\/\/insolvencyinsider.ca\/p\/thentia-group-transitions-from-receivership-to-ccaa-with-cross-border-sale-strategy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">the restructuring of Thentia Global Systems Inc<\/a>. and its affiliates, a cross-border technology group with operations and customer relationships in Canada, the United States and Europe.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In February 2026, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) granted CCAA protection to the Thentia group and appointed Grant Thornton Limited as Monitor. The Court also authorized the Monitor to act as foreign representative for the purpose of seeking recognition of the Canadian proceeding in the United States. Miller Thomson acts as counsel to the Monitor.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Shortly thereafter, Chapter 15 proceedings were commenced in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware seeking recognition of the Canadian CCAA proceedings as foreign main proceedings. The U.S. Court granted provisional relief while the recognition application proceeded, providing a mechanism to coordinate the Canadian restructuring with Thentia&#8217;s significant U.S. operations and assets.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"non-main\">This case illustrates the same cross-border principle from the opposite direction: a restructuring order does not necessarily travel with the debtor simply because the business crosses borders. Where the principal restructuring is in Canada, Chapter 15 can provide the U.S. legal infrastructure needed to protect assets, coordinate proceedings and support implementation of the Canadian restructuring south of the border. Conversely, where the principal proceeding is outside Canada, Part IV of the CCAA or Part XIII of the BIA performs the corresponding recognition function in Canada.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What if the foreign proceeding is non-main?&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"creditor\">Non-main recognition is not failed recognition. It means the proceeding qualifies, but it is not taking place where the debtor has its COMI. The consequence is important: the mandatory section 48 package associated with foreign-main recognition does not automatically follow. Instead, under section 49, the foreign representative asks the Canadian court for relief that is necessary to protect property or creditor interests, and that relief can include the same types of stays available on main recognition.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">If you are a foreign creditor, what rights &#8211; and deadline &#8211; matter most?&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A U.S., European or Asian creditor is not subordinated because it is outside Canada.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"deadline\">The CCAA definitions expressly contemplate secured and unsecured creditors resident or domiciled outside Canada. A foreign creditor can monitor the court record and the monitor&#8217;s reports, appear where its interests are affected, assert or dispute claims, rely on set-off where <a href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/C-36\/section-21.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">section 21<\/a> applies, participate in a sale or claims process and, if a plan compromises its claim, vote in the appropriate class.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The deadline most likely to be missed is the claims bar date&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is no single statutory CCAA proof-of-claim deadline. Claims processes are usually established by court order, and the order can create bar dates for specified claims, including contingent, restructuring, D&amp;O or transaction-related claims depending on the process. The monitor&#8217;s website and notices are therefore not administrative background; they are part of the procedural record that determines whether and how a creditor participates.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"creditor-rights\">Courts have discretion in appropriate circumstances to allow a late or amended claim, but that is not an entitlement. For a foreign creditor, the practical discipline is simple: as soon as a Canadian customer or counterparty enters CCAA protection, identify the monitor, download the initial and subsequent orders, calendar every claims, sale-process and hearing deadline, and determine whether the claim includes more than ordinary trade receivables &#8211; for example, damages, indemnities, guarantees, set-off, security or contractual termination rights.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Some creditor rights expire even faster than a claims bar date&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The proceeding itself can create short, process-specific windows. For example, <a href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/B-3\/section-81.1.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">section 81.1 of the BIA<\/a> can permit an unpaid supplier to repossess qualifying goods delivered to a purchaser within the applicable 30-day period before bankruptcy or receivership, but the prescribed written demand generally must be made within 15 days after the bankruptcy or receivership and the goods must still satisfy detailed statutory conditions. The right ranks ahead of other claims to those goods, but it disappears quickly if not exercised.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"signals\">That remedy does not simply translate into every CCAA case, which is precisely the point. A foreign creditor should identify the Canadian proceeding before assuming that its only option is to file an unsecured proof of claim. Bankruptcy, receivership, a BIA proposal and CCAA protection can preserve &#8211; or eliminate &#8211; different remedies on different timelines.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What signals tell a CFO to move from monitoring to restructuring planning?&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Canadian restructurings often appear sudden from head office because the legal filing occurs on one day. The operational deterioration usually does not. Six to twelve months earlier, the pattern is often visible in the way the subsidiary funds itself, pays statutory obligations and interacts with its lender group.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Signal 1: the subsidiary has stopped funding its own working capital&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Recurring emergency parent advances, cash calls immediately before payroll, chronic intercompany receivables, stretched payables or repeated requests to defer group charges are evidence that the Canadian business is no longer self-funding. The relevant question is no longer simply whether head office can send another tranche. It is what that tranche buys: time to complete a transaction, or only a later crisis date.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Signal 2: statutory and critical obligations are becoming a liquidity source&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When management begins deferring source deductions, GST\/HST, payroll, pension contributions, rent or critical suppliers to create liquidity, the company is no longer simply stretching payables. Not every dollar of accounts payable is economically equivalent once distress is visible: different obligations can attract different deemed-trust, priority, director-liability or operational consequences, and those consequences can change again depending on whether the company enters a proposal, CCAA proceeding, bankruptcy or receivership.<sup data-fn=\"7994c1fa-7c71-4157-b836-e12658764693\" class=\"fn\"><a href=\"#7994c1fa-7c71-4157-b836-e12658764693\" id=\"7994c1fa-7c71-4157-b836-e12658764693-link\">7<\/a><\/sup>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Signal 3: the lender has shifted from relationship management to downside protection&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"options\">Frequent borrowing-base testing, recurring covenant waivers, tighter reserves, weekly liquidity reporting, independent business reviews, demands for additional security or a formal reservation of rights should be treated as restructuring signals. By the time a secured creditor issues a notice of intention to enforce security under <a href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/B-3\/section-244.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">section 244 of the BIA<\/a>, the debtor may still have options, but the timetable is no longer solely management&#8217;s.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">At the first warning signs, move from reporting to an options process&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a sophisticated CFO, a 13-week cash flow is the starting point, not the end product. The model should be entity-specific and show unrestricted cash, borrowing availability, covenant or borrowing-base headroom, critical payments, statutory remittances, parent funding assumptions and forecast-to-actual variance. Management should know not just when cash reaches zero, but which assumption causes the break and what decisions move that date.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In parallel, the group should build a legal and transactional map: secured debt and priority claims by legal entity; guarantees and cross-defaults; material leases, licences and customer contracts; intercompany balances and recent affiliate transactions; payroll and tax exposure; key employees and suppliers; security registrations; pending litigation; and any assets or operations in Quebec that require a distinct civil-law analysis.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"intervention\">The board should also define the outcome it is funding. A consensual amendment, refinancing, parent recapitalization, going-concern sale, BIA proposal and CCAA process have different timing, information and liquidity requirements. &#8220;Keep funding until something happens&#8221; is not a restructuring strategy.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The intervention that changes outcomes is funded optionality&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The single intervention that most changes the outcome is usually enough liquidity and stakeholder stability to run a process rather than react to one. That runway can come from parent support, a bridge facility, a lender standstill or forbearance, asset monetization, or &#8211; once in a formal process &#8211; court-approved interim financing. <a href=\"https:\/\/laws-lois.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/C-36\/section-11.2.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Section 11.2 of the CCAA<\/a> permits interim financing secured by a court-ordered charge, with the court considering factors including duration, management, creditor confidence, prospects of a viable restructuring, asset value and material prejudice to creditors. The BIA has a parallel interim-financing power in proposal proceedings.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"quebec\">It becomes &#8220;too late&#8221; as a practical matter before it becomes too late as a legal matter. A company can still file after liquidity is severely constrained, but the menu of outcomes may have collapsed. When payroll is at risk, critical suppliers have stopped shipping, customers are leaving and secured lenders are ready to enforce, a restructuring statute may preserve order without preserving much optionality.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What changes when assets or operations are in Quebec?&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"ppsa\">The federal insolvency statutes apply across Canada. The private-law rights that enter those proceedings do not. Quebec is the clearest example because its private law is based on the Civil Code of Quebec rather than the common law used in the other provinces and territories.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Security is not a PPSA exercise&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the common-law provinces, consensual security over personal property is generally analyzed under provincial Personal Property Security Act legislation. Quebec instead uses a civil-law framework of hypothecs, priorities and publication of rights. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca\/fr\/version\/lc\/CCQ-1991?code=se:2660&amp;history=20231206&amp;langCont=en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Article 2660 of the Civil Code<\/a> defines a hypothec as a real right over movable or immovable property securing performance of an obligation, with realization rights and preference according to rank. Quebec also recognizes prior claims, and some have priority over hypothecs regardless of when the hypothec was published.<sup data-fn=\"6e15e638-15e5-4afd-a552-317bb007955b\" class=\"fn\"><a href=\"#6e15e638-15e5-4afd-a552-317bb007955b\" id=\"6e15e638-15e5-4afd-a552-317bb007955b-link\">8<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"provincial\">Depending on the right and property, publication may involve the Register of Personal and Movable Real Rights (RDPRM) or the land register. The creation, scope, publication, rank and enforcement analysis is therefore not a matter of swapping a Quebec registration for an Ontario PPSA registration.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The broader provincial trap is assuming one Canadian commercial law&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Quebec is the most visible distinction, but the underlying point applies nationally. Insolvency is federal; property, security, many contractual issues, real estate, employment and other commercial rights are substantially provincial. A cross-border restructuring can therefore be national in strategy while still requiring province-specific diligence on the rights that determine priority, leverage and value.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"bottom-line\">For a foreign lender or parent, this is often the surprise: the CCAA court may be administering one national restructuring, but it is doing so against legal rights created by more than one private-law system. A security review or enforcement analysis prepared for Ontario should not simply be rolled across Quebec.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-base-2-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-container-core-group-is-layout-03cab32d wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium);padding-right:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium);padding-left:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium)\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key takeaways&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Separate corporate existence does not isolate the foreign parent from the Canadian subsidiary&#8217;s insolvency. Guarantees remain live. Director liability persists. Intercompany transactions made when distress was visible can be reviewed and reversed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Map your group exposure before distress becomes acute, such as guarantees, cross-defaults, cash pooling, intercompany balances, and director liability across the Canadian structure. This is most valuable and least expensive before a filing, not after.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The CCAA and BIA are different tools for different problems. Choosing the wrong one, or choosing too late, consumes liquidity without preserving optionality. The process choice should be deliberate and advised.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>An NOI under the BIA creates a hard statutory clock: cash-flow materials within 10 days, a proposal within 30 days with capped extensions. Missing the deadline produces a deemed assignment in bankruptcy. The clock starts on filing.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Foreign insolvency proceedings do not automatically create a Canadian stay. Recognition under Part IV of the CCAA is required, and COMI classification determines whether the mandatory section 48 protection package applies.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Foreign creditors are not subordinated by geography, but claims bar dates in Canadian proceedings are set by court order, not statute. Identify the monitor, download the orders, and calendar every deadline from day one of the Canadian proceeding.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The three early warning signals: the subsidiary has stopped self-funding, statutory obligations are being deferred, and the lender has shifted to downside protection, are visible six to twelve months before a formal filing. Move from monitoring to an options process at the first signal, not the third.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>&#8220;Keep funding until something happens&#8221; is not a restructuring strategy. Define the outcome the board is funding and confirm there is enough runway to execute it before committing the next tranche.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Quebec assets require Quebec civil law analysis. Security taken in common-law provinces does not transfer to Quebec. A CCAA proceeding is national; the private-law rights inside it are not.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--medium)\">How Miller Thomson can help&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The critical Canadian restructuring decision is usually made before the court filing. A company that identifies group exposure, chooses the right statutory route, and preserves enough liquidity to execute a plan can use the CCAA or BIA as a value-preservation tool. A company that arrives after liquidity and stakeholder support have disappeared may still obtain an orderly process, but not the same range of outcomes. Miller Thomson&#8217;s Restructuring and Insolvency team advises foreign parents, Canadian subsidiaries, lenders, and creditors on domestic and cross-border restructurings across Canada, including CCAA and BIA proceedings, foreign recognition, distressed M&amp;A, and Quebec-specific issues. Our cross-border experience includes acting as counsel to the Monitor in the Thentia Global Systems CCAA proceeding, where Canadian and US proceedings were coordinated to protect assets and support a cross-border sale process. Early advice is most valuable when the business still has choices.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Speak with a Miller Thomson <a href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/expertise\/corporate\/restructuring-insolvency\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Restructuring and Insolvency<\/a> lawyer about your Canadian exposure.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-footnotes\"><li id=\"89dbcd44-96d3-48ad-a161-a8a60b8b6165\">\u00a0<em>Companies&#8217; Creditors Arrangement Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 (CCAA), ss. 11.03(2) and 11.04. <a href=\"#89dbcd44-96d3-48ad-a161-a8a60b8b6165-link\" aria-label=\"Jump to footnote reference 1\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><\/li><li id=\"9b126603-6621-463d-9709-885d7f0015ad\"><em>BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders<\/em>, 2008 SCC 69 at paras. 36-37; <em>Peoples Department Stores Inc. (Trustee of) v. Wise<\/em>, 2004 SCC 68 at paras. 32-43; <em>Canada Business Corporations Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44, s. 119; <em>Income Tax Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), s. 227.1; <em>Excise Tax Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-15, s. 323. <a href=\"#9b126603-6621-463d-9709-885d7f0015ad-link\" aria-label=\"Jump to footnote reference 2\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><\/li><li id=\"ce567f79-338e-41ee-b510-080468b67f85\">CCAA, s. 36.1; <em>Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (BIA), ss. 95(1)(b) and 96(1)(b). Section 96 may also apply to arm&#8217;s-length transfers within its separate statutory test <a href=\"#ce567f79-338e-41ee-b510-080468b67f85-link\" aria-label=\"Jump to footnote reference 3\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><\/li><li id=\"773e541c-58ea-4583-8a61-00dec3487974\">BIA, ss. 50.4(2), 50.4(8)-(11) and 69(1). See also BIA, ss. 50.6 (interim financing) and 65.13 (court-authorized sale or disposition outside the ordinary course). <a href=\"#773e541c-58ea-4583-8a61-00dec3487974-link\" aria-label=\"Jump to footnote reference 4\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><\/li><li id=\"7b9401a9-63c7-475e-ab77-02714a7a00f8\">CCAA, ss. 45 and 47; <em>Hornblower Cruises and Events Canada Ltd<\/em>., 2024 ONSC 1209 at paras. 21-33 (registered-office presumption rebutted by evidence of operational realities and central management). <a href=\"#7b9401a9-63c7-475e-ab77-02714a7a00f8-link\" aria-label=\"Jump to footnote reference 5\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><\/li><li id=\"aa5b053e-d878-4d25-b084-4a231543a705\">CCAA, ss. 48 and 49. Part IV expressly promotes cooperation, legal certainty, fair and efficient administration, value maximization and rescue of financially troubled businesses: CCAA, s. 44. <a href=\"#aa5b053e-d878-4d25-b084-4a231543a705-link\" aria-label=\"Jump to footnote reference 6\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><\/li><li id=\"7994c1fa-7c71-4157-b836-e12658764693\">CCAA, s. 37; BIA, ss. 67(2)-(3) and 86. These provisions illustrate that Crown claims and statutory deemed trusts are not treated uniformly in insolvency. Source-deduction deemed trusts are specifically preserved by the CCAA and BIA, while other Crown claims may be affected differently by the proceeding and the applicable legislation. <a href=\"#7994c1fa-7c71-4157-b836-e12658764693-link\" aria-label=\"Jump to footnote reference 7\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><\/li><li id=\"6e15e638-15e5-4afd-a552-317bb007955b\">Civil Code of Quebec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 2650, 2657 and 2660. Article 2657 provides that prior claims rank, according to their order among themselves and without regard to date, before movable or immovable hypothecs. <a href=\"#6e15e638-15e5-4afd-a552-317bb007955b-link\" aria-label=\"Jump to footnote reference 8\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Who this is for: CFOs, GCs, and boards of foreign companies with Canadian subsidiaries showing signs of financial stress, and foreign lenders and creditors with exposure to Canadian debtors. Canada&#8217;s restructuring framework is sophisticated, court-supervised, and capable of handling complex cross-border situations. But it operates differently from Chapter 11, the UK&#8217;s restructuring plan, and most [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":56088,"parent":53629,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"[{\"content\":\"\u00a0<em>Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 (CCAA), ss. 11.03(2) and 11.04.\",\"id\":\"89dbcd44-96d3-48ad-a161-a8a60b8b6165\"},{\"content\":\"<em>BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders<\/em>, 2008 SCC 69 at paras. 36-37; <em>Peoples Department Stores Inc. (Trustee of) v. Wise<\/em>, 2004 SCC 68 at paras. 32-43; <em>Canada Business Corporations Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44, s. 119; <em>Income Tax Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), s. 227.1; <em>Excise Tax Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-15, s. 323.\",\"id\":\"9b126603-6621-463d-9709-885d7f0015ad\"},{\"content\":\"CCAA, s. 36.1; <em>Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act<\/em>, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (BIA), ss. 95(1)(b) and 96(1)(b). Section 96 may also apply to arm's-length transfers within its separate statutory test\",\"id\":\"ce567f79-338e-41ee-b510-080468b67f85\"},{\"content\":\"BIA, ss. 50.4(2), 50.4(8)-(11) and 69(1). See also BIA, ss. 50.6 (interim financing) and 65.13 (court-authorized sale or disposition outside the ordinary course).\",\"id\":\"773e541c-58ea-4583-8a61-00dec3487974\"},{\"content\":\"CCAA, ss. 45 and 47; <em>Hornblower Cruises and Events Canada Ltd<\/em>., 2024 ONSC 1209 at paras. 21-33 (registered-office presumption rebutted by evidence of operational realities and central management).\",\"id\":\"7b9401a9-63c7-475e-ab77-02714a7a00f8\"},{\"content\":\"CCAA, ss. 48 and 49. Part IV expressly promotes cooperation, legal certainty, fair and efficient administration, value maximization and rescue of financially troubled businesses: CCAA, s. 44.\",\"id\":\"aa5b053e-d878-4d25-b084-4a231543a705\"},{\"content\":\"CCAA, s. 37; BIA, ss. 67(2)-(3) and 86. These provisions illustrate that Crown claims and statutory deemed trusts are not treated uniformly in insolvency. Source-deduction deemed trusts are specifically preserved by the CCAA and BIA, while other Crown claims may be affected differently by the proceeding and the applicable legislation.\",\"id\":\"7994c1fa-7c71-4157-b836-e12658764693\"},{\"content\":\"Civil Code of Quebec, CQLR c. CCQ-1991, arts. 2650, 2657 and 2660. Article 2657 provides that prior claims rank, according to their order among themselves and without regard to date, before movable or immovable hypothecs.\",\"id\":\"6e15e638-15e5-4afd-a552-317bb007955b\"}]"},"categories":[632],"insight-format":[742],"class_list":["post-55713","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-publications"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0 | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"When a Canadian subsidiary faces financial stress, Canada\u2019s insolvency regime can shape outcomes for foreign parents, lenders, and creditors.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0 | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When a Canadian subsidiary faces financial stress, Canada\u2019s insolvency regime can shape outcomes for foreign parents, lenders, and creditors.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-28T18:09:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-29T18:42:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1098\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Katherine Chan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Katherine Chan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Katherine Chan\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6\"},\"headline\":\"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-28T18:09:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-29T18:42:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3971,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Publications\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/\",\"name\":\"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0 | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-28T18:09:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-29T18:42:53+00:00\",\"description\":\"When a Canadian subsidiary faces financial stress, Canada\u2019s insolvency regime can shape outcomes for foreign parents, lenders, and creditors.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1098,\"caption\":\"Close-up of a person\u2019s hand pressing buttons on a calculator at a desk. A tablet, documents and a notebook are nearby\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Doing business in Canada\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/publications\\\/doing-business-in-canada\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/MillerThomsonLaw\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/millerthomson\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/miller-thomson-llp\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6\",\"name\":\"Katherine Chan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Katherine Chan\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0 | Miller Thomson","description":"When a Canadian subsidiary faces financial stress, Canada\u2019s insolvency regime can shape outcomes for foreign parents, lenders, and creditors.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0 | Miller Thomson","og_description":"When a Canadian subsidiary faces financial stress, Canada\u2019s insolvency regime can shape outcomes for foreign parents, lenders, and creditors.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2026-09-28T18:09:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-29T18:42:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1098,"url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Katherine Chan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Katherine Chan","Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/"},"author":{"name":"Katherine Chan","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6"},"headline":"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0","datePublished":"2026-09-28T18:09:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-29T18:42:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/"},"wordCount":3971,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg","articleSection":["Publications"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/","name":"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0 | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg","datePublished":"2026-09-28T18:09:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-29T18:42:53+00:00","description":"When a Canadian subsidiary faces financial stress, Canada\u2019s insolvency regime can shape outcomes for foreign parents, lenders, and creditors.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/DBIC_restructuring.jpg","width":1920,"height":1098,"caption":"Close-up of a person\u2019s hand pressing buttons on a calculator at a desk. A tablet, documents and a notebook are nearby"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/canadian-insolvency-law-what-foreign-companies-need-to-know-when-a-subsidiary-is\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Doing business in Canada","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/publications\/doing-business-in-canada\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Canadian insolvency law: What foreign companies need to know when a subsidiary\u00a0is in distress\u00a0\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","name":"Miller Thomson","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5473b50a564d1e37f327fdd79cb348f6","name":"Katherine Chan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/da8a18c240b27905220d948a87957ba19ab6de326b44a2ce3072235c121f996f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Katherine Chan"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55713","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55713"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55713\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56492,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55713\/revisions\/56492"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53629"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/56088"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55713"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=55713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}