{"id":53965,"date":"2026-08-12T09:35:18","date_gmt":"2026-08-12T13:35:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/?p=53965"},"modified":"2026-08-12T09:35:21","modified_gmt":"2026-08-12T13:35:21","slug":"your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/","title":{"rendered":"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd.<\/i>"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Some commercial contracts include a provision that if litigation arises, the losing party will pay the winner\u2019s full legal costs \u2014 termed \u201csolicitor-client costs\u201d. It seems straightforward: you negotiate and sign a contract that appears to stipulate that if you end up in court and win, you get your legal fees covered by your contracting partner. A recent Alberta decision confirms that is not always how it works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the recent Alberta Court of King\u2019s Bench (the \u201cCourt<\/strong>\u201d) decision of La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd<\/em><\/a>,<\/em> 2026 ABKB 434, Justice Silver declined to enforce a contractual provision, agreed to by the plaintiff and defendant, to award solicitor-client costs in the event of litigation.[1]<\/a> The decision makes clear that even if there is agreement to pay solicitor-client costs, Courts retain discretion not to award costs on that basis if they are not justifiable and reasonable in the circumstances. Furthermore, it serves as an important practical reminder that how you document and present your legal costs can be a factor in the assessment of the reasonableness and justifiability of those costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Background: a land sale, a breach of contract, and a fight over who pays the winner\u2019s legal fees<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The underlying trial decision concerned a dispute between a vendor and purchaser of land. The plaintiff vendor was successful in its breach of contract claim against the defendant purchaser and was awarded damages of about $878,482 plus interest at trial.[2]<\/a> The Court was then tasked with determining the appropriate costs award, as the parties were unable to reach agreement on same.[3]<\/a> The La Caille <\/em>decision summarized herein is the Court\u2019s decision on costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The plaintiff argued that it should be awarded solicitor-client costs, relying on the contractual agreement between it and the defendant that stipulated such costs in the event of litigation.[4]<\/a> Alternatively, the plaintiff sought costs using a three-times multiplier of the Schedule C tariff costs.[5]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The defendant, on the other hand, argued that the contractual term for solicitor-client costs should not be enforced because the plaintiff had engaged in improper conduct.[6]<\/a> They also argued that awarding solicitor-client costs would create a “windfall” because the property’s value had increased after the transaction failed.[7]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

What the Court decided: solicitor-client costs refused, party-and-party costs awarded instead<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Court ultimately exercised its discretion to depart from the parties\u2019 pre-negotiated contractual term, finding that a solicitor-client costs award would be:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. unjustified in light of the lack of detail in the submitted bill of costs;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. disproportionate relative to the damages awarded; and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. harsh in the circumstances.[8]<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Instead, the Court awarded costs on a party-and-party basis, with a two times multiplier applied to the Schedule C Tariff amounts (except for the second lawyer fees), for a total cost award of $378,270 plus reasonable disbursements.[9]<\/a>  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    When can a court override a contractual solicitor-client costs provision?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The Court began its analysis by enunciating the general rule that courts should enforce contractual terms freely bargained between parties, including those that award solicitor-client costs if litigation ensues,[10]<\/a> except in accordance with two narrow exceptions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    1. for abusive forms of litigation or other litigation misconduct by the party seeking to rely on the contractual costs provision;[11]<\/a> and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. where the resulting costs award is disproportionate, harsh, unreasonable, or unjustified in the circumstances.[12]<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      In other words, freedom of contract generally ought to prevail; however, courts retain residual discretion not to enforce a contractual costs term in these exceptional circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The Court clarified that litigation misconduct that justifies exercising discretion to depart from a negotiated term must relate to the conduct of litigation, not pre-litigation misconduct, as costs are not to punish the litigant for their \u201cgeneral character, conduct or motivations.\u201d[13]<\/a> This narrow exception serves the important purpose of ensuring that court procedures are not abused and the Court retains overriding authority to manage and supervise the process before them.[14]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The Court also instructed that the proportionality and reasonableness of a contractual costs award is to be considered against the amount claimed, the way the litigation was conducted, the amount awarded, the degree of success achieved, and other factors.[15]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Why the Court refused to enforce the contractual costs term: two key reasons<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Although the Court ultimately declined to enforce the solicitor-client costs provision in the parties\u2019 contract, it did not do so for the reasons advanced by the defendant.[16]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The Court disagreed with the defendant\u2019s assertion that the plaintiff\u2019s actions amounted to litigation misconduct that could be compensated by costs.[17]<\/a> It found that the impugned actions did not increase costs or unnecessarily extend the trial.[18]<\/a> Furthermore, the misconduct being relied upon was already addressed in the Court\u2019s trial decision and the awarded damages.[19]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      However, the Court did exercise its discretion to depart from the solicitor-client costs agreement for two key reasons:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \n
      1. An award of solicitor-client costs in this case would equal, and potentially exceed (given the 18% interest rate specified in the contract), the damages awarded to the plaintiff.[20]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
      2. The plaintiff\u2019s Bill of Costs lacked sufficient detail and itemization to allow the Court to appreciate whether the \u201ccosts expended [were] both qualitatively and quantitatively proportionate to the action amount\u201d and reasonable in the circumstances.[21]<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

        Taking both of these factors into account, the Court determined that an award of solicitor-client costs would be \u201cdisproportionate and unduly harsh,\u201d[22]<\/a> thereby justifying its refusal to enforce the contractual provision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        As a result, the Court turned to a review of the factors under Rule 10.33 to fashion an appropriate costs award in the circumstances. It ultimately ordered costs under Rule 10.31(3)(b), being a party-and-party basis with a two-times multiplier applied to the Schedule C tariff.[23]<\/a> The length of the trial, the substantial value of the claim, and the complexity of the legal issues justified an increase to the tariff amounts.[24]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Practical takeaways<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

        La Caille<\/em> confirms that a contractual solicitor-client costs provision is not guaranteed to be enforced. Here is what contracting parties and litigants should do to give that provision its best chance of being enforced:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        1. Build your Bill of Costs from day one<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

        The plaintiff in La Caille<\/em> lost its contractual costs entitlement in part because its Bill of Costs lacked sufficient detail. Track legal fees and disbursements with specificity throughout the litigation. A well-documented and itemized Bill of Costs is a critical tool for any party seeking to recover legal fees, as it is the main method for justifying the claimed costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        2. Watch the proportionality ratio<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

        If your legal costs approach or exceed the damages you are claiming, that may be a sign of disproportionality of the costs award, regardless of your contractual entitlement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        3. Keep litigation conduct beyond reproach<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

        While the Court in La Caille<\/em> did not find litigation misconduct on the facts, the exception is real and can be invoked. Conduct that unnecessarily extends proceedings or increases costs, even if the party ultimately succeeds, can provide grounds for a court to override a negotiated costs provision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Conclusion<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

        The La Caille<\/em> decision highlights that while courts will generally uphold contractual solicitor-client costs provisions, narrow exceptions do exist and can be applied in practice. Courts may depart from such provisions where there has been litigation misconduct by the party seeking costs, or the costs claimed are unreasonable, disproportionate, or would cause an unduly harsh outcome in the circumstances. In determining whether to exercise this discretion, courts will consider the circumstances of the litigation as a whole, including the manner in which the litigation was conducted, the proportionality of the costs relative to the amount in issue, the degree of success achieved, and the reasonableness and supporting detail of the Bill of Costs. If you are drafting a commercial contract and want to ensure your costs provision is enforceable, or if you are involved in litigation where a contractual costs term is in dispute, please contact a lawyer from our Miller Thomson\u2019s Commercial Litigation group<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \n\n\n\n

        [1]<\/a> La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd<\/em>, 2026 ABKB 434 at para 31 [La Caille<\/em>]<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [2]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [3]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [4]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [5]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at paras 2 and 16.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [6]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 3.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [7]<\/a> Ibid.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [8]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 20.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [9]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at pars 31-32.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [10]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 6.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [11]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at paras 6-8.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [12]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at paras 9-10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [13]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 11 citing Driving Force Inc v I Spy-Eagle Eyes Safety Inc<\/em><\/strong>, 2022 ABCA 25 at para 73.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [14]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 7.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [15]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at paras 9-10.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [16]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 4.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [17]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 14.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [18]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 13.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [19]<\/a> Ibid.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [20]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 17.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [21]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at paras 19 and 30.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [22]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 20.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [23]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at para 31.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        [24]<\/a> Ibid <\/em>at paras 27 and 31.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        Some commercial contracts include a provision that if litigation arises, the losing party will pay the winner\u2019s full legal costs \u2014 termed \u201csolicitor-client costs\u201d. It seems straightforward: you negotiate and sign a contract that appears to stipulate that if you end up in court and win, you get your legal fees covered by your contracting […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":122,"featured_media":32405,"parent":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[545],"insight-format":[416],"class_list":["post-53965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commercial-litigation"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYour contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd. | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd. | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Some commercial contracts include a provision that if litigation arises, the losing party will pay the winner\u2019s full legal costs \u2014 termed \u201csolicitor-client costs\u201d. It seems straightforward: you negotiate and sign a contract that appears to stipulate that if you end up in court and win, you get your legal fees covered by your contracting […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-12T13:35:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-12T13:35:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1098\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sebastian Vives\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sebastian Vives\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sebastian Vives\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be05481ca4ee617c24b33993ade4c881\"},\"headline\":\"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd.\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-12T13:35:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-12T13:35:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1424,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Commercial Litigation\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/\",\"name\":\"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd. | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-12T13:35:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-12T13:35:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1098,\"caption\":\"Lawyers planning with laptop in office for trial preparation\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/commercial-litigation\\\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/MillerThomsonLaw\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/millerthomson\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/miller-thomson-llp\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.millerthomson.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be05481ca4ee617c24b33993ade4c881\",\"name\":\"Sebastian Vives\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9c50194d3d05da0f277cc6ce0c163d04a4150aed35e0d008c0cba4866c37cc31?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9c50194d3d05da0f277cc6ce0c163d04a4150aed35e0d008c0cba4866c37cc31?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9c50194d3d05da0f277cc6ce0c163d04a4150aed35e0d008c0cba4866c37cc31?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sebastian Vives\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd. | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd. | Miller Thomson","og_description":"Some commercial contracts include a provision that if litigation arises, the losing party will pay the winner\u2019s full legal costs \u2014 termed \u201csolicitor-client costs\u201d. It seems straightforward: you negotiate and sign a contract that appears to stipulate that if you end up in court and win, you get your legal fees covered by your contracting […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2026-08-12T13:35:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-12T13:35:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1098,"url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sebastian Vives","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sebastian Vives","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/"},"author":{"name":"Sebastian Vives","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be05481ca4ee617c24b33993ade4c881"},"headline":"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd.","datePublished":"2026-08-12T13:35:18+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-12T13:35:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/"},"wordCount":1424,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg","articleSection":["Commercial Litigation"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/","name":"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd. | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg","datePublished":"2026-08-12T13:35:18+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-12T13:35:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/insights_litigation_lawyers.jpg","width":1920,"height":1098,"caption":"Lawyers planning with laptop in office for trial preparation"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/commercial-litigation\/your-contract-says-youll-get-full-legal-costs-if-you-win-but-courts-may-disagree-lessons-from-la-caille-north-point-inc-v-2160806-alberta-ltd\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Your contract says you\u2019ll get full legal costs if you win, but courts may disagree: Lessons from La Caille North Point Inc v 2160806 Alberta Ltd."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","name":"Miller Thomson","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/be05481ca4ee617c24b33993ade4c881","name":"Sebastian Vives","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c50194d3d05da0f277cc6ce0c163d04a4150aed35e0d008c0cba4866c37cc31?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c50194d3d05da0f277cc6ce0c163d04a4150aed35e0d008c0cba4866c37cc31?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c50194d3d05da0f277cc6ce0c163d04a4150aed35e0d008c0cba4866c37cc31?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sebastian Vives"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/122"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53965"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53965\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53969,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53965\/revisions\/53969"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32405"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53965"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=53965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}