{"id":5224,"date":"2018-07-03T15:15:21","date_gmt":"2018-07-03T19:15:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/"},"modified":"2024-09-16T11:05:35","modified_gmt":"2024-09-16T15:05:35","slug":"who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Who is My Neighbour?  SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In Canadian tort law, a duty of care requires a relationship of sufficient proximity.\u00a0 That relationship is informed by the foreseeability of an adverse consequence of one\u2019s actions, subject to policy reasons that a duty of care should not be recognized.\u00a0 As such, Canadian law continues to follow the principles established by the UK House of Lords in its 1977 decision <em>Anns v. Merton London Borough Council<\/em>.<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In an important decision, the Supreme Court of Canada (\u201c<strong><em>SCC<\/em><\/strong>\u201d) has revisited the question of foreseeability in establishing a duty of care.\u00a0 In <em>Rankin\u2019s Garage &amp; Sales v. J.J.<\/em>, 2018 SCC 19 (\u201c<strong><em>Rankin\u2019s<\/em><\/strong>\u201d), a garage owner left keys in the ashtray of an unlocked car. Two youths, intoxicated by alcohol and marijuana, were prowling in an effort to steal from unlocked cars, and they found the keys in the ashtray.\u00a0 Despite an absence of either driving experience or a driver\u2019s licence, they went on an ill-fated joy-ride resulting in a crash that left one of the youths with a catastrophic brain injury. \u00a0Lower courts found the garage owner contributorily negligent.\u00a0 The SCC ruled that the garage owner owed no duty of care to the injured youth.<\/p>\n<p>The majority of the SCC reasoned that \u201c<em>to find a duty, there must be some circumstance or evidence to suggest that a person in the position of the defendant ought to have reasonably foreseen the risk of injury \u2014 that the stolen vehicle could be operated unsafely<\/em>.\u201d\u00a0 By the SCC\u2019s reasoning, while it was foreseeable that the car might be stolen, it was not foreseeable that it would be stolen by intoxicated youths lacking driving experience and that they would drive recklessly resulting in a catastrophic injury.<\/p>\n<p>The SCC has not changed the legal test for a duty of care.\u00a0 The test continues to involve an analysis of both reasonable foreseeability and proximity. The first question is whether the harm that occurred was the reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant\u2019s act. The second question is whether there is a relationship of such a nature that the defendant may be said to be under an obligation to be mindful of the plaintiff\u2019s legitimate interests in conducting his or her affairs.<\/p>\n<p>The decision in <em>Rankin\u2019s<\/em>, however, is a clear signal from the SCC that a car is not to be treated in the same manner as a \u2018loaded gun\u2019 and that it is not an inherently dangerous object. Risk needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis, and a duty of care must be based on a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm rather than just a mere possibility of one.<\/p>\n<p>We are of the view that the SCC has placed an important limit on the breadth of foreseeability in establishing a duty of care.\u00a0 For the underwriting industry, this decision is an important one as it indicates that the responsibility of companies and professionals in general is not so broad that it would include reasonably foreseeable acts that are not directly connected to the facts and circumstances before the court.<\/p>\n<p>Underwriters for professionals should still be wary of the potential liability that may arise in any line of business but they can take some assurance that the SCC is not willing to broaden the scope of liability to circumstances where the facts do not clearly indicate a link of reasonable foreseeability. We are hopeful that this decision will operate to extinguish a duty of care alleged to be owed by insured professionals and others.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> [1978] AC 728.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Canadian tort law, a duty of care requires a relationship of sufficient proximity.\u00a0 That relationship is informed by the foreseeability of an adverse consequence of one\u2019s actions, subject to policy reasons that a duty of care should not be recognized.\u00a0 As such, Canadian law continues to follow the principles established by the UK House [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14371,"parent":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[536],"insight-format":[416],"class_list":["post-5224","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lloyds-brief"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law | Miller Thomson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law | Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Canadian tort law, a duty of care requires a relationship of sufficient proximity.\u00a0 That relationship is informed by the foreseeability of an adverse consequence of one\u2019s actions, subject to policy reasons that a duty of care should not be recognized.\u00a0 As such, Canadian law continues to follow the principles established by the UK House [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Miller Thomson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-03T19:15:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-16T15:05:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1776\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"994\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@millerthomson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3f9143e8aec04617923b89fecf6886ea\"},\"headline\":\"Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-03T19:15:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-16T15:05:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/\"},\"wordCount\":597,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Lloyd's Brief\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/\",\"name\":\"Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law | Miller Thomson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-03T19:15:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-16T15:05:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg\",\"width\":1776,\"height\":994},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"description\":\"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Miller Thomson\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg\",\"width\":380,\"height\":50,\"caption\":\"Miller Thomson\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3f9143e8aec04617923b89fecf6886ea\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2fb85dacd7d0cf6d162ec9c30c25b90c6e69a82dbe5ebe52991d2ec0d73e4890?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2fb85dacd7d0cf6d162ec9c30c25b90c6e69a82dbe5ebe52991d2ec0d73e4890?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law | Miller Thomson","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law | Miller Thomson","og_description":"In Canadian tort law, a duty of care requires a relationship of sufficient proximity.\u00a0 That relationship is informed by the foreseeability of an adverse consequence of one\u2019s actions, subject to policy reasons that a duty of care should not be recognized.\u00a0 As such, Canadian law continues to follow the principles established by the UK House [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/","og_site_name":"Miller Thomson","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","article_published_time":"2018-07-03T19:15:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-16T15:05:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1776,"height":994,"url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@millerthomson","twitter_site":"@millerthomson","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3f9143e8aec04617923b89fecf6886ea"},"headline":"Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law","datePublished":"2018-07-03T19:15:21+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-16T15:05:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/"},"wordCount":597,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg","articleSection":["Lloyd's Brief"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/","name":"Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law | Miller Thomson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg","datePublished":"2018-07-03T19:15:21+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-16T15:05:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Lloyd-s-Brief_Post-Image.jpg","width":1776,"height":994},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/lloyds-brief\/who-is-my-neighbour-scc-rules-on-foreseeability-and-the-duty-of-care-in-tort-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Who is My Neighbour? SCC Rules on Foreseeability and the Duty of Care in Tort Law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","name":"Miller Thomson","description":"National law firm providing business law expertise and litigation and disputes services for businesses across Canada since 1957.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Miller Thomson","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/miller-thomson.svg","width":380,"height":50,"caption":"Miller Thomson"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/MillerThomsonLaw\/","https:\/\/x.com\/millerthomson","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/miller-thomson-llp\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@millerthomson"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/3f9143e8aec04617923b89fecf6886ea","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2fb85dacd7d0cf6d162ec9c30c25b90c6e69a82dbe5ebe52991d2ec0d73e4890?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2fb85dacd7d0cf6d162ec9c30c25b90c6e69a82dbe5ebe52991d2ec0d73e4890?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5224","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5224"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5224\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14371"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5224"},{"taxonomy":"insight-format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/insight-format?post=5224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}