{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Miller Thomson","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","author_name":"Katherine Chan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/author\/chank\/","title":"A foul ball to the head: No negligence established under the Occupier's Liability Act | Miller Thomson","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yvRInbcoIx\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/negligence-occupiers-liability-act\/\">A foul ball to the head: No negligence established under the <i>Occupier&#8217;s Liability Act<\/i><\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/insights\/insurance\/negligence-occupiers-liability-act\/embed\/#?secret=yvRInbcoIx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;A foul ball to the head: No negligence established under the &lt;i&gt;Occupier&#8217;s Liability Act&lt;\/i&gt;&#8221; &#8212; Miller Thomson\" data-secret=\"yvRInbcoIx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Insights_Insurance_Post-Image.jpg","thumbnail_width":1776,"thumbnail_height":994,"description":"Introduction The British Columbia Court of Appeal, in Rivers v North Vancouver (District), 2021 BCCA 407, considered a negligence claim brought pursuant to the common law and British Columbia\u2019s Occupiers Liability Act (the &#8220;Act&#8221;). In doing so, they clarified what the court must consider in determining whether an occupier created an unreasonable risk of harm. [&hellip;]"}