{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Miller Thomson","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/","author_name":"Gus Gonzalez","author_url":"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/author\/gonzg\/","title":"Construction seminar - R. v. Greater Sudbury: Owner\u2019s obligations (and potential liability) as an employer under OHSA | Miller Thomson","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"L7wsNAJGEv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/events\/construction-seminar-hybrid\/\">Construction seminar &#8211; R. v. Greater Sudbury: Owner\u2019s obligations (and potential liability) as an employer under OHSA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/en\/events\/construction-seminar-hybrid\/embed\/#?secret=L7wsNAJGEv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Construction seminar &#8211; R. v. Greater Sudbury: Owner\u2019s obligations (and potential liability) as an employer under OHSA&#8221; &#8212; Miller Thomson\" data-secret=\"L7wsNAJGEv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.millerthomson.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"R. v. Greater Sudbury: Owner\u2019s Obligations (and Potential Liability) as an Employer under OHSA In November 2023 the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision in R. v. Greater Sudbury (City)\u00a0dealing with the obligations (and liabilities) of project owners in Ontario under the\u00a0Occupational Health and Safety Act. The decision affects every owner that undertakes a [&hellip;]"}