Can Employers Terminate Disobedient Employees for Cause?

February 12, 2016 | M. Ashley Mitchell

It is generally understood that employees must follow the lawful orders of their employers and may be disciplined for disobeying such orders.  However, the more difficult question faced by employers is whether a disobedient employee can be fired for just cause.   Although not every instance of disobedience will allow an employer to dismiss an employee for cause, the recent decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court in Cotter v. Point Grey Golf and Country Club, 2016 BCSC 10, confirms that an employer may have cause to terminate an employee whose repeated actions are willfully disobedient and “seriously incompatible with the employee’s duties”.

Mr. Cotter, a chartered accountant, was a controller with 16.5 years of service at the time of his dismissal.  His duties as the controller for the employer included tracking and reporting on company finances, assisting with audits and signing management representation letters to the auditors.

In 2010, it was discovered that the employer has neglected to include information about its new pro shop in its annual update to BC Assessment in 2008 and 2009, which could have impacted its property taxes.  The employer immediately took steps to resolve the issue by notifying BC Assessment and its auditors of the oversight.  BC Assessment subsequently informed the employer that there would be no changes to its tax assessments as a result of the overdue filing of information returns.  Accordingly, the employer viewed the issue as resolved.

Mr. Cotter, however, did not see the issue as resolved and took the position that there was an outstanding liability for property taxes that should be reflected in the employer’s audited financial statements and management representation letters.  He also spoke with a number of other parties about the issue, breaching his duty of confidentiality to his employer.  On four separate occasions, Mr. Cotter was warned by his employer to refrain from pursuing or discussing the matter further.  Despite these warnings, Mr. Cotter continued to pursue the matter and refused to sign the 2013 management representation letter to the auditors.  As a result of his disobedient conduct, he was terminated for just cause.

Mr. Cotter sued his former employer claiming damages for wrongful dismissal.  The employer took the position that it had grounds to terminate Mr. Cotter for cause due to his repeated insubordinate behaviour.

In the Court’s decision, the law on disobedience was summarized: where an employer has issued directions that are lawful and not dishonest, it will amount to insubordination if those directions are disobeyed.  The Court also noted that an employer will have just cause to dismiss an employee where the employee has been insubordinate and willfully disobedient to the employer’s orders in a matter of substance, to the extent that the employer loses trust in the employee.

The Court concluded that Mr. Cotter was wilfully disobedient and insubordinate in defying “clear and unequivocal” directions from his direct supervisor and in ignoring repeated warnings that were given to him by his employer.  The Court held that these actions, coupled with Mr. Cotter’s disclosure of confidential information to other individuals, were incompatible with an employer-employee relationship,  justifying Mr. Cotter’s termination for cause.  As a result, Mr. Cotter’s claims were dismissed.

Lesson for Employers

Not every incident of disobedience by an employee will give an employer just cause to terminate an employee’s employment. Whether an employee’s disobedience at work will justify a dismissal for cause will depend on the circumstances of each case, including the nature and seriousness of the conduct.  However, the decision in Cotter demonstrates that termination for cause may be justified where an employee’s disobedience or insubordination is so serious that the result is a fundamental breakdown in the employer-employee relationship. 


This publication is provided as an information service and may include items reported from other sources. We do not warrant its accuracy. This information is not meant as legal opinion or advice.

Miller Thomson LLP uses your contact information to send you information electronically on legal topics, seminars, and firm events that may be of interest to you. If you have any questions about our information practices or obligations under Canada’s anti-spam laws, please contact us at

© Miller Thomson LLP. This publication may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety provided no alterations are made to the form or content. Any other form of reproduction or distribution requires the prior written consent of Miller Thomson LLP which may be requested by contacting