SEC v. Citigroup and No-Contest Settlements

June 24, 2014 | Caleb Edwards

The recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, SEC v. Citigrouphas implications for Ontario’s new “no-contest” settlement policy.  The Second Circuit overturned Judge Rakoff’s decision in the Citigroup case and confirmed that “no-contest” settlements are permissible – even where they appeared to allow a defendant to simply pay a fine and escape a finding of liability.

In March, the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) released Staff Notice 15-702 Revised Credit for Cooperation Program.  The new policy includes provisions permitting Staff of the OSC to enter into settlements with respondents who agree not to contest staff’s allegations.  Judge Rakoff’s decision was a touchstone for those who were critical of “no-contest” settlements.

Possibly prompted by the criticism of these settlements from Rakoff and others, the OSC released a policy with strict limitations on when “no-contest” settlements are available. This will likely limit the number of settlements that actually occur. For more on that topic, read our bulletin.

By reiterating that “no-contest” settlements are permissible and even desirable in the US system, the Second Circuit has created more space for the OSC to expand its own “no-contest” policy, should it choose to do so.


This blog sets out a variety of materials relating to the law to be used for educational and non-commercial purposes only; the author(s) of this blog do not intend the blog to be a source of legal advice. Please retain and seek the advice of a lawyer and use your own good judgement before choosing to act on any information included in the blog. If you choose to rely on the materials, you do so entirely at your own risk.