Confirmation that Leave Required For Refusals Motion Following Delivery of Trial Record

July 15, 2013

Confirmation that Leave Required For Refusals Motion Following Delivery of Trial Record
Hamilton v. Ontario (MTO) 2013 ONSC 4536

On July 15, 2013 Justice Firestone ruled that, where a party has delivered a trial record, they must obtain leave to bring a motion seeking answers to questions refused on discovery.

Prior to the release of the reasons of Justice Firestone there were two directly conflicting decisions on the issue.   In a February 2010 decision, Van Ginkel v. East Asia Minerals Corp 2010 ONSC 905, Justice Perrell held that leave was required.   In a July 2010 decision, Blagrove v. Whittington 2010 ONSC 3748, Justice Lauwers held leave was not required.

For further reasons with respect to this issue it is helpful to also review the decision of Master Graham in Jetport Inc. v. Global Aerospace Underwriting Managers et al 2013 ONSC 2740 which was referenced by Justice Firestone.

Disclaimer

This publication is provided as an information service and may include items reported from other sources. We do not warrant its accuracy. This information is not meant as legal opinion or advice.

Miller Thomson LLP uses your contact information to send you information electronically on legal topics, seminars, and firm events that may be of interest to you. If you have any questions about our information practices or obligations under Canada’s anti-spam laws, please contact us at privacy@millerthomson.com.

© Miller Thomson LLP. This publication may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety provided no alterations are made to the form or content. Any other form of reproduction or distribution requires the prior written consent of Miller Thomson LLP which may be requested by contacting newsletters@millerthomson.com.