Matthew E. Hewson, Edmonton
Even if it is your land, over time, it may
become somebody else’s. This is the
effect of the law of adverse possession.
Adverse possession arises when somebody
occupies the land of another (sometimes referred to as squatter’s rights). This can occur in many situations, including
a mistakenly placed fence line, a misplaced building or even an adverse
possessor simply occupying otherwise vacant land – it could even be a person
living on the land you own but don’t make it out to very often.
The point is that it is possible for an
adverse possessor to attain an interest in the registered owner’s land just by
occupying it. The key is the occupier
possessing the land for long enough (typically 10 years).
The recent case of 1215565 Alberta Ltd. v. Canadian Wellhead Isolation Corp., 2012
ABQB 145 (“Wellhead”) summarizes and interprets the law of adverse possession in
light of changes to the Limitation of
Actions Act of Alberta.
Wellhead involves a misplaced fence line,
put there by predecessors in title.
Shortly before the expiration of the 10 year limitation period (the
statutory length of time possession must have occurred for), the owner by title
of the disputed lands became aware of the error. However, he did not do enough to assert his
rights within the time limits. There are
a number of key points to take away from the case:
1. The limitation period for the person being adversely possesesd against begins on the transfer of title; because of the Torrens system in Alberta, a purchaser can typically rely on the title they are given. As an aside, if the adverse possessor sells land they adversely possess, the buyer buys the portion of time the adverse possessor has into the possession.
2. For the adverse possession to be effective to get title:
(a)
the true owner must be out of
possession of the lands;
(b)
the claimant must be in use and
occupation of the claimed lands;
(c)
the claimant’s use and
occupation must be exclusive, continuous, open or visible and notorious for the
10 year period; and
(d)
the belief, ignorance, mistake
or intention of the claimant is immaterial.
1. The main ways to deal with an adverse possessor within the 10 years is to:
(a)
re-enter the property in order
to recover possession;
(b)
get an acknowledgment of title
from the person in possession of the property (i.e. an Encroachment Agreement);
or
(c)
take proceedings to recover the
property.
One of the main issues in Wellhead was
whether the titled owner re-entered to recover possession. There must be more than a mere entry. In Wellhead, there were entries to take
measurements and such; and this was evidence of an intention to recover
possession, but was not an actual act of recovering possession:
It is my view that
to be effective any entry must be accompanied by an overt act or acts which
objectively show the intention to recover the land then and there. Just as the
possession of the Plaintiff had to be open and notorious as against the
Defendant and the world, the acts of the Defendant, if it relies on entry to
recover the land, should be unequivocal. (at para. 34)
When your land is at stake, it is best not
to dawdle but critical to properly assert your ownership in time. Part of being able to assert your rights is
knowing they are being violated. As
such, owners must continually monitor their lands and property boundaries. This is especially important on what would be
otherwise vacant lands.
Back to top
© Miller Thomson LLP, 2012. All Rights Reserved. All Intellectual Property Rights including copyright in this publication are owned by Miller Thomson LLP. This publication may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety provided no alterations are made to the form or content. Any other form of reproduction or distribution requires the prior written consent of Miller Thomson LLP which may be requested from the Editor(s).
This publication is provided as an information service and is a summary of current legal issues. This information is not meant as legal opinion and readers are cautioned not to act on information provided in this publication without seeking specific legal advice with respect to their unique circumstances.
Miller Thomson LLP uses your contact information to send you information on legal topics and firm events that may be of interest to you. It does not share your personal information outside the firm, except with subcontractors who have agreed to abide by its privacy policy and other rules. If you do not wish Miller Thomson to use your contact information in this manner, please notify us at newsletters@millerthomson.com and include "Privacy Request" in the subject line.