Staff Advice and Recommendations Not Publicly Accessible Upon Request
Gillian Tuck Kutarna, Guelph
The Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act (“FIPPA”) and its municipal equivalent provide that every
person has a right of access to a record or a part of a record in the custody
or under the control of the government of Ontario or a government institution,
with certain exceptions. One such
exception allows the head of an institution to refuse disclosure when the
record “would reveal advice or recommendations of a public servant, any other
person employed in the service of an institution, or a consultant retained by
the institution.”
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently
considered the scope of this exception.
The Minister of Finance appealed a decision of the Privacy Commissioner
who had ordered access to what were described by the court as “draft option
papers”.
When interpreting what qualifies as the
“advice or recommendations of a public servant”, which do not have
to be released, compared to factual information or empirical reports which do,
the Court of Appeal clarified that this exception was designed to protect the
decision-making process within public institutions. Therefore, where the content of the records
in question relates to a suggested course of action and pertain to a decision
that will ultimately be made, the exception can be applied.
The Court found that the adjudicator for
the Information and Privacy Commissioner erred in holding that to have the
right to refuse disclosure, the records relating to a course of action must be
communicated directly to the final decision-maker, or that the author must
recommend a single course of action. The
Court held that a recommendation may suggest a preferred course of action, but
“advice is also protected which may be no more than material that permits the
drawing of inferences with respect to a suggested course of action ….”
As subsection 7(1) of
the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (MFIPPA)
provides for the same exception as subsection 13(1) of
FIPPA, this should reassure school board and municipal staff that they may
continue to produce private advice and recommendations as part of a protected
deliberative process.
Back to issue
© Miller Thomson LLP, 2013. All Rights Reserved. All Intellectual
Property Rights including copyright in this publication are owned by
Miller Thomson LLP. This publication may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety provided no alterations are made to the form or content.
Any other form of reproduction or distribution requires the prior
written consent of Miller Thomson LLP which may be requested from the
Editor(s).
This publication is provided as an information service and is a
summary of current legal issues. This information is not meant as legal
opinion and readers are cautioned not to act on information provided in
this publication without seeking specific legal advice with respect to
their unique circumstances.
Miller Thomson LLP uses your contact information to send you
information on legal topics and firm events that may be of interest to
you. It does not share your personal information outside the firm,
except with subcontractors who have agreed to abide by its privacy
policy and other rules. If you do not wish Miller Thomson to use your
contact information in this manner, please notify us at newsletters@millerthomson.com and include "Privacy Request" in the subject line.