Report of the Standing Committee on Finance – Tax Incentives for Charitable Giving in Canada

February 2013 | Susan M. Manwaring

In February 2013, the Standing Committee on
Finance released its report on Tax Incentives for Charitable Giving in
Canada.  The Committee’s report can be
found here.  This report followed the adoption by the
House of Commons of a motion, introduced by Mr. Peter Braid in March 2011, that
“the Standing Committee on Finance be instructed to undertake a study of the
current tax incentives for charitable donations with a view to encouraging
increased giving, including but not limited to (i) reviewing changes to the
charitable tax credit amount, (ii) reviewing the possible extension of the
capital gains exemption to private company shares and real estate when donated
to a charitable organization, (iii) considering the feasibility of implementing
these measures and that the Committee report its findings to the House.”

The Committee took the study quite
seriously and over the course of eight meetings heard from 36 organizations and
five individuals who presented from various perspectives on the topic of the

of the report outlines the Committee’s recommendations to enhance
charitable giving.

Overall there are 12 recommendations listed.
Six of the recommendations relate to the tax system, four relate to public
awareness, one is in respect of the “red tape burden” and the last relates to

To the extent that these recommendations
relate to tax initiatives, they are, in some respects, disappointing.

The Committee did support the stretch tax
credit initiative being advanced by Imagine Canada and others within the voluntary sector. This would provide increased tax recognition to the extent that a donor increases his or her donations from previous years. It also endorsed the Federal Government exploring the feasibility of
lowering the capital gains tax on gifts of real property and gifts of shares of
private corporations to charities.  That
said, the Committee made these recommendations subject to the Government’s
stated intention to balance the Budget in the medium term. To that extent, it is uncertain how strong the recommendations will be perceived to be. 

The Committee’s request that the Federal
Government devote resources to monitoring the charitable sector and working
with the charitable sector on public awareness were positive.  It is hoped that resources will be put back
into Statistics Canada and other programs in order to ensure that the
monitoring and information that has historically been available, and a great
assistance to the sector, will continue. The recommendation on red tape burden
was well received and will hopefully be persuasive within the Department of

The report of the Standing Committee is an
interesting read and is commended to all with an interest in the sector.  There are many interesting thoughts and
suggestions advanced in the report that show that the charitable sector in
Canada is healthy.  It is hoped that the
report will encourage the Federal Government to continue introducing positive
measures to support the sector going forward.

The NDP members of the Committee included a
which is also an interesting read. 
The NDP members of the Finance Committee are of the firm belief that
support for the charitable sector must not be politicized or dependent on
ideology.  They are also concerned that
any new incentives designed to increase charitable giving by Canadians not be
seen as a rationale for cutting Government spending on programs to help
Canadians in need.


This publication is provided as an information service and may include items reported from other sources. We do not warrant its accuracy. This information is not meant as legal opinion or advice.

Miller Thomson LLP uses your contact information to send you information electronically on legal topics, seminars, and firm events that may be of interest to you. If you have any questions about our information practices or obligations under Canada's anti-spam laws, please contact us at

© 2018 Miller Thomson LLP. This publication may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety provided no alterations are made to the form or content. Any other form of reproduction or distribution requires the prior written consent of Miller Thomson LLP which may be requested by contacting