The Duty to Defend Triggered Notwithstanding Environmental and Pollution Exclusion Clauses
More from this issue
Case Commentary: Himark Homes Ltd. v Janas, 2017 BCSC 1719 and Subrogated Warranty Claims Against Building Consultants
Cybersecurity In Canada: What to Expect in 2018
Liability Issues for Architects Revisited: An Analysis of Vermilion & District Housing Foundation v Binder Construction Limited
Cybersecurity: Are Social Engineering Attacks Covered Under Insurance Policies?
Tavern Claims: Intoxication Does Not Equal Liability
Mediation in British Columbia: Does Mandatory Mediation Mean Mandatory Attendance for Lloyd’s Underwriters?
When Is a Release Full and Final?
Lloyd’s Review – Deslaurier Custom Cabinets Inc. v 1728106 Ontario Inc. 2016 ONCA 246
Coverage Issues in Sexual Abuse Claims (Part 2)
Privacy Commissioner Issues Report on Ashley Madison Cyber-Attack
Limitations of Liability Carry the Day
Builders’ Risk Insurance – The Supreme Court Clarifies the Rules of Interpretation
The Challenges of Limitations in Sexual Abuse Claims
Update on Ontario Limitations: Waiting to Complete Examinations for Discovery to Identify Potential Tortfeasors?
Case Commentary: An Insurer is not Responsible for Defence Costs Incurred Prior to Receiving Notice of a Claim – Lloyd’s Underwriters v. Blue Mountain Log Sales Ltd., 2016 BCCA 352
Fort McMurray Fire Loss Update: The “Beast” – Its Cost to the Insurance Industry and the Need for Greater Risk Management
Upcoming Amendments to British Columbia’s Costs Rules: An Update
Case Commentary: Defeating an Application to be Added as a Defendant – The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 2971 v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, et al., 2016 BCSC 581